VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Sweety @ Savita, D/o. Lt. Sh. Sawan Shah, W/o. Sh. Anil Kohli – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Sahni – Respondent
ORDER :
The instant petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 20.10.2021, passed by the Rent Controller Solan, District Solan, H.P., in Rent Petition No.22/2 of 2007, titled as Tarun Sahni and others vs. Manhonan Sahni and another, whereby an application preferred by the petitioner and respondent No.7-Harish Anand, under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) for impleading them as petitioners in the Rent Petition, has been dismissed.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the material placed before me.
3. Respondents No.1 to 4 (hereinafter referred to as ‘landlords/respondents’) have filed Rent Petition for vacation of premises, in reference in Rent Petition, for non-payment of arrears of rent and impairment of the premises by tenants Manmohan Sahni and Bal Krishan Sahni (respondents No.5 and 6) sons of late Sh. Sawan Shah Sahni (hereinafter referred to as ‘tenants’).
4. The Rent Petition is at its advanced stage, wherein after hearing arguments, final order is to be pronounced. Petitioner Sweety is real sister of tenants Manmohan Sahni and Bal Krishan Sahni. Respondent No.7 Harish Anand is son of Usha. Usha was al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.