SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 558

SATYEN VAIDYA
Babu Ram S/o Soniya Ram – Appellant
Versus
Amit Sharma, S/o Lyak Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Shtutika, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sh. Surinder Saklani

ORDER :

By way of instant petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 6.5.2022, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Shillai, District Sirmour, H.P. in case No. 69 of 2021, titled as Amit Sharma vs. Babu Ram.

2. Petitioner herein is the accused before learned trial Court in complaint filed against him by the respondent herein under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After closure of his defence evidence, petitioner herein/accused filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to examine two witnesses named Bhagat Ram and Madan Singh. It was submitted in the application that the accused had already raised a defence that the complainant/respondent herein was engaged in business of ‘Chit Fund’ and had procured security cheques from various persons including the accused/petitioner herein. As per the petitioner herein/accused, the witnesses sought to be examined by him were also the victims of respondent herein/complainant and would prove the factum of having handed over blank security cheques to the complainant. It was also submitted that the examination of such witnesses was necessary for the purposes of probalizing the defence of accused. Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top