SANDEEP SHARMA
Satish Kumar Sonof Late Sh. Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
By way of instant petition filed under S. 482 CrPC, prayer has been made on behalf of petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 120, dated 29.11.2019, registered at Police Station Parwanoo under Ss. 363, 366A and 376 IPC and S.6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act on the ground that the petitioner as well as victim-prosecutrix, respondent No.2 Sonika Minj, have solemnized marriage, coupled with the fact that she has not supported the prosecution case, while making her deposition before learned trial Court.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from record are that the FIR sought to be quashed in the instant proceedings came to be lodged at the behest of Smt. Sita Devi, who happens to be mother of respondent No.2 Sonika Mind, alleging therein that her daughter, Sonika Minj, aged 14 years has gone missing since 19.11.2019. She alleged that since her daughter was in constant touch with the petitioner, she has apprehension that the petitioner has made her daughter elope with him taking undue advantage of her innocence and minority. Though, after completion of investigation, police presented challan in the competent court of law, but before same could be taken
Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another (2014) 6 SCC 466
State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others
State of Karnataka vs. L. Muniswamy and others
Prashant Bharti v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Rajiv Thapar and Ors v. Madan Lal Kapoor
R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866
Smt. Nagawwa v. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi and Others (1976) 3 SCC 736
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.