CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Sanjay Kumar S/o. Sh. Daya Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present petition is maintained by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R No.149 of 2016 dated 17.6.2016, under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Dhalli, District Shimla, H.P. alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stated the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that respondent No.2/complainant made a complaint before the police alleging therein that she solemnized marriage with petitioner No.1, namely, Sanjay Kumar, according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies. After sometime, petitioners started maltreating respondent No.2 regarding insufficient dowry and started treating her with cruelty. On the basis of statement of the complainant, FIR in question was registered. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise in view of (Annexure P-3) stating therein that the complainant does not want to pursue the case against the petitioners. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the pe
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.