Parvinder Singh Kittna vs State of H. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(HP) 701

SATYEN VAIDYA
Parvinder Singh Kittna – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri.
For the Respondents:Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Narender Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.

JUDGMENT :

Satyen Vaidya, J.

The petitioner has prayed for grant of pre arrest bail in case FIR No. 181/2022, dated 15.08.2022, under Sections 451, 341, 147, 149, 506 IPC registered at Police Station Haroli, District Una, H.P. Petitioner was admitted on interim bail on 30.09.2022 and thereafter he has joined investigation.

2. The allegations against the petitioner are that on 14.08.2022 at around 1.30 noon, petitioner along with seven other unknown persons formed an unlawful assembly and entered into the official complex and mining area of stone crusher of the complainant Shri Rakesh Chander. It is also alleged that the petitioner demanded extortion amount of Rs. Two Lacs per month for allowing the complainant to operate his crusher. It is further alleged that the petitioner and his accomplices had shot videos of the crusher and office through mobile phones without authority and permission.

3. In the status report filed by respondents, though it is submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation after having been admitted to interim bail by this Court, but is alleged to have not disclosed the names of his accomplices and is further accused of not handing over his mobile phone.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document