SATYEN VAIDYA
Dushyant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-
ii) That the respondent No.1 may be directed to consider and then to promote the applicant as Joint Secretary on regular or on ad-hoc basis (whichever is beneficial) from due dates w.e.f. 16.8.2014 when case was recommended/forwarded by the respondent Board to Govt. for ad-hoc promotion) or w.e.f. 25.9.2014 (Department of Personnel gave its approval for ad-hoc promotion to respondent No.1) or w.e.f. 30.9.2014 (date of retirement of applicant) which is beneficial, as per the past practice borne out from Annexure A-26 or even otherwise, with all consequential benefits, forthwith.
iii) That the respondents may be directed to give benefit of higher pay fixation on promotion as Joint Secretary on regular or ad-hoc basis, from due date as in relief (ii) above, and to give benefit of higher pay fixation for all revised retiral benefits including monthly pension w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.