MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Megraj Gurung – Appellant
Versus
State Legislative Assembly Secretariat (Slas) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial consideration of promotion fairness. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. judicial interpretation of rule relaxation parameters. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. determination of irrationality in orders. (Para 19) |
| 4. decision to cancel r2's promotion. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. - The Petitioner herein, an aspirant to the post of Joint Secretary in the Sikkim Legislative Assembly Secretariat (for short, the 'SLAS'), is disgruntled by the State action of granting promotion to the Respondent No.2 (for short, 'R2'), to the post of Joint Secretary, by way of upgradation, duly relaxing the relevant Rules, without considering the Petitioner for promotion to the same post, although he was similarly situated with R2 and held a higher educational qualification. He seeks a declaration that the impugned promotion of R2 is mala fide, arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional being against the provisions of the Sikkim Legislative Assembly Secretariat (Methods of Recruitment and Qualifications for Appointment) Order, 1984, dated 20-05-1985 (hereinafter, 'Recruitment Order 1984'). That, a writ of or in the nature of Mandamus be issued commanding the Respondent No.1 (for short, 'R1') to ca
Amita vs. Union of India and Another : (2005) 13 SCC 721
Anil Kumar Vitthal Shete and Others vs. State of Maharashtra and Another (2006) 12 SCC 148
Ashok Kumar Uppal and Others vs. State of J&K and Others (1998) 4 SCC 179
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. R. Santhakumari Velusamy and Others (2011) 9 SCC 510
J.C. Yadav and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others AIR 1990 SC 857
Kathi Raning Rawat vs. State of Saurashtra AIR 1952 SC 123
Randhir Singh vs. Union of India and Others AIR 1982 SC 879
Sandeep Kumar Sharma vs. State of Punjab and Others (1997) 10 SCC 298
Sikkim vs. Dorjee Tshering Bhutia and Others (1991) 4 SCC 243
Smt. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Another AIR 1978 SC 597
State of Gujarat and Others vs. Arvindkumar T. Tiwari and Another (2012) 9 SCC 545
State of Kerala and Another vs. N.M. Thomas and Others (1976) 2 SCC 310
State of Maharashtra vs. Jagannath Achyut Karandikar AIR 1989 SC 1133
Promotions within public service must adhere to established criteria to uphold equality under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, prohibiting arbitrary decisions that favor select individuals.
Promotion to Government service must prioritize merit and ability over seniority; no legal right to promotion exists.
The court upheld the state's relaxation of recruitment rules for employees lacking qualifications, asserting that such measures can mitigate undue hardship while respecting public service needs.
The discretionary nature of the powers of the High Court under Article 226, absence of a fixed period for considering delay, and the principle of equality enshrined in the constitution were central l....
Adverse reports if are expunged or if not as per the rules, and the time has run out for affirming or rejecting the same by the authority as in the present case, the same shall not be a reason to den....
It is now a well-settled principle of law that an executive order must be passed in conformity with rules. Power of State Government to issue executive instructions is confined to filling up of the g....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.