IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Sunita Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & others - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No.1041 of 2021
Decided On : 06-03-2023
Himachal Pradesh Municipal Election Rules, 2015 - Rule 12, (7) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 243T - Election - Seat reserved for Women - Seat reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Contest and elect as President against seat reserved for Women on ground that respondent No.5 for belonging to a Scheduled Caste category, was not eligible to contest and seek election as President/Chairperson, which was reserved for Women belonging to General Category – All women entitled to compete and contest seat reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are also eligible for seat meant for all as well as women belong to Open or General Category. (Para 38)
Finding of the Court: In election matters, person can be unseated by way of not only Election Petition but also by filing an appropriate Writ Petition of Quo Warranto, by a person, where there is no alternate remedy is available, and elected person, being ineligible to hold said office, has usurped post and power, but for petitioner, in present case, in facts and circumstances narrated hereinabove, such recourse is also not available, as even otherwise, as discussed supra, respondent No.5 is not ineligible person to hold office of Chairperson/President of Municipal Council so as to enable petitioner to maintain a writ petition of Quo Warranto against her for holding said office because respondent No.5 is eligible and entitled to hold said office.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
In instant petition, petitioner has assailed action of respondents-State, allowing respondent No.5 to contest and thereafter elect her as President of Municipal Council Dehra, District Kangra against the seat reserved for Women (General), on the ground that respondent No.5 Sunita Kumari, for belonging to a Scheduled Caste category, was not eligible to contest and seek election as President/Chairperson, which was reserved for Women belonging to General Category.
2. I have heard Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned Senior Advocate, on behalf of petitioner; Mr. Kapil Dev Sood, Senior Advocate, appearing for respondent No.5 and Mr. Hemant Vaid, learned Additional Advocate General, for respondent-State, and have also gone through the material placed before me.
3. Undisputed facts, in present case, are that for conducting elections for Members/Office-bearers of Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats in District Kangra, Deputy Commissioner Kangra issued Order dated 4.9.2020, announcing category-wise reservation of the Wards, whereby Ward No.3 Hanuman Mandir was allocated to General Category, whereas Ward No.6 Shiv Mandir was reserved for women.
4. On 17.12.2020, Government of Himachal Pradesh issued Notification, notifying reservation to the Offices of the Chairpersons in Municipalities in District Kangra, wherein office of Chairperson of Municipal Council Dehra was reserved for Women (General) Category.
5. Petitioner and respondent No.5 are elected Members of Municipal Council Dehra. Petitioner contested election from Ward No.6 Shiv Mandir against a seat reserved for Women (General Category), whereas respondent No.5 contested election from Ward No.3 Hanuman Mandir allocated for General Category. It is also undisputed that respondent No.5 belongs to Scheduled Caste category.
6. Elections for electing Members of Municipal Council Dehra were conducted from on 10.1.2021 onwards and petitioner and respondent No.5 were declared elected as Ward Members from their respective Wards from which they contested the election. Thereafter, election for Office of President/Chairperson of Municipal Council Dehra, which was reserved for Women belonging to General Category, was fixed on 18.1.2021.
7. Vide communication dated 15.1.2021, Returning Oficer-cum-SDO(C), Dehra, sought clarification from Deputy Commissioner, Kangra, regarding reservation of post of President in Municipal Council Dehra, on the following points:
2. If a women has not taken benefit of her SC category and has fought election in open ward, whether she is eligible for president post?
3. The women candidate has not attached any caste certificate with her nomination paper
4. In case the candidate of President seat under general category has no majority, what procedure we should adopt?”
8. District Election Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Una, had also sought clarification with respect to reservation of seats of Chairpersons and Members of Urban Local Bodies (ULB). In response thereto, vide communication dated 16.1.2021, Secretary (UD) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh had conveyed to the District Election Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Una, as under:
“The Hon’ble apex Court vide Judgment dated 10-02-2009 passed in Civil Appeal No.976 of 2009 titled as Bihari Lal Rada Vs Anil Jain (Tinu) and others on the basis of the Law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in other cases has held that there is nothing in law that a person belonging to backward class and got himself elected from a ward reserved for that class is debarred from contesting the election in the office of President/Chairperson when that office is not reserved and meant to be filled in from the mem
All women belonging to all categories, irrespective of their religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, are entitled to contest election for seats meant for all as well as women belonging to Open ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that reservation is with reference to the category/caste to which the person belongs and not the nature of the constituency from which they were el....
The court mandated that reservation laws for elections must prioritize women in the Scheduled Caste category to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and support gender justice.
A person elected in a general category to a Gram Panchayat can contest for the post of Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha in a reserved category, as long as they belong to that reserved category.
The constitutional mandate of reserving not less than one-third of the total number of seats for women and the statutory mandate of having regard to the concentration of population of SCs, STs, and O....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation of seats in Municipal Council elections should adhere to the provisions of the Rules 1999, ensuring co-terminus reservation te....
The reservation and allotment of seats for Panchayat Elections must be made in accordance with the provisions of the Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act, 2001 and the Jharkhand Panchayat Election Rules, 2001....
The court emphasized that the State Legislature has decided to rotate the seats of reserved categories, exercising its discretion in favor of the rotation of seats only, and quashed the impugned gaze....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.