SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 267

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Appellant
Versus
Madan Lal - Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 699 of 2022
Decided on : 22-05-2023

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta & Mr. Rupinder Singh, Additional Advocates General.
For the Respondents: Mr. Karan Singh, Amicus Curiae

Point of Law: NDPS Act itself does not permit re-sampling or re-testing of sample.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Section 52A - Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 - Section 25(4) - Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Section 13(2) - Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 56 - Certification of inventory - Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances - Whether any request or application preferred by the prosecution for re-testing and re-examination of the remaining quantity of recovered contraband i.e. cannabis can be entertained under the Act, as a matter of course - Re-testing and re-sampling is rampant at every stage of the trial contrary to other legislations which define a specific time-frame within which the right may be available (Para 4).

Finding of the Court :

Re-testing/re-sampling is not just confined to the sample already tested/sampled/taken out. The phrase includes within its ambit seeking tests of remaining sample/bulk quantity not previously tested. In absence of compelling circumstances, all kinds of re-testing/re -sampling are prohibited. It is the pleaded case of prosecution that while issuing certificate under Section 52A of the Act, the mode and manner of making the bulk of contraband homogenous before drawing two samples was not specified. That there is no material on record to show or to suggest that samples drawn were representative samples.

Result: Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

A sample of cannabis drawn by prosecution from the recovered bulk quantity was sent for scientific examination on 25.02.2022. The analysis report came on 28.03.2022. Prosecution at this stage felt the need to have the entire recovered contraband tested. Application moved for this purpose on 05.07.2022 was dismissed by the learned trial Court on 21.07.2022, hence this revision petition.

2. Prosecution case is that :-

2(i) 1.8 Kg. of cannabis was seized from respondent-accused on 23.02.2022.

(ii) On 24.02.2022, the recovered contraband was forwarded to Judicial Magistrate in terms of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (in short the Act) for certification of inventory. Two samples each of 26 Gms.were drawn from bulk cannabis. Consequently, three parcels were made i.e. two sample parcels of 26 Gms.each and remaining third bulk parcel of 1.748 Kg.

2(iii) On 25.02.2022, one of the sample parcels (weighing 26 Gms.) was sent for chemical analysis to State Forensic Science Laboratory (SFSL), Junga. Its report was received on 28.03.2022. 2(iv) While scrutinizing the case, the Public Prosecutor raised the objection that entire cannabis recovered from the accused had to be analysed chemically, whereafter the remaining cannabis i.e. bulk parcel (1.748 kg. Gms) and the other sample parcel (26 Gms.) were sent for chemical analysis to SFSL, Junga on 09.06.2022. The scientific expert on 10.06.2022 refused to analyse these parcels without order of the Court. Hence, the prosecution on 05.07.2022 moved an application for chemical analysis of the remaining cannabis contained in two parcels i.e. bulk parcel, weighing 1.748 Gms. and the sample parcel weighing 26 Gms. This application was dismissed by the learned Special Judge on 21.07.2022, hence the prosecution instituted this revision petition on 01.11.2022.

3. Notice of this petition was issued to the respondent-accused on 06.12.2022 for his appearance on 06.03.2023. He was duly served, but did not remain present in the Court on 06.03.2023. Therefore, bailable warrants were issued against him returnable for 26.04.2023. On the next date, i.e. 26.04.2023, cognizance was taken of a certificate dated 21.04.2023 issued by the Superintendent (Jail), District-cum-Open Air Jail, Chamba certifying that the respondent-accused was admitted in the said jail on 26.02.2022 in FIR No. 1 of 2022, dated 23.02.2022 registered under Section 20 of the Act and that he was presently confined in the said jail. In view of the above, Mr. Karan Sharma, learned Advocate, was appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 01.05.2023.

4. I have heard learned Amicus Curiae and the learned Additional Advocate General for the petitioner.

4(i) Following question is involved in the case :- Whether any request or application preferred by the prosecution for re-testing and re-examination of the remaining quantity of recovered contraband i.e. cannabis weighing 1.748 Kg. + 0.026 Kg. = 1.774 Kg. can be entertained under the Act, as a matter of course ?

4(ii) Hon’ble apex Court in (2013) 2 SCC 590 Thana Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics, held that NDPS Act itself does not permit re-sampling or re-testing of sample. Re-testing and re-sampling is rampant at every stage of the trial contrary to other legislations which define a specific time-frame within which the right may be available. Re-sampling may be an important right of an accused, the haphazard manner in which the right is imported from other legislations without its accompanying restrictions, however, is impermissible. The apex Court further observed that a reverence must also be given to the wisdom of the legislature when it expressly omitted out a provision, which otherwise appears as a standard one in other legislations viz. the Customs Act, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act etc. The legislature unlike the NDPS Act, enacted Section 25(4) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940, Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulterat

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top