Back
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, VIRENDER SINGH
Nehar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
1. Petitioner, Nehar Singh has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following substantive reliefs:
(ii) That appropriate writ, order or direction may very kindly be issued directing the respondents to compensate the petitioner adequately to the tune of Rs. 3 lac on account of losing an opportunity for consideration to the public employment and also for suffering physically, mentally and financially in the interest of law and justice.
(a) That appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued and clause 6.67 of the ordinance may very kindly be quashed and set aside.”
2. The factual position, as pleaded in the wri
Courts should not interfere in academic matters of educational institutions, unless or until same does not pass test of reasonableness or are violative of principles of natural justice.
The court held that the decision of the respondent authorities to disqualify the petitioner under Regulation 5(a) without finding mala-fide possession of material was non-speaking and cryptic, and fa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's intervention to correct the illegal and arbitrary alteration of marks in the answer scripts, ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to r....
An administrative order is only effective when communicated to the affected party, and failure to provide a fair hearing or necessary materials constitutes a violation of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to intervene in cases of illegal, mala fide, or arbitrary exercise of power and discretion by State authorities, and to grant equ....
Point of Law – Courts will interfere only if they find all or any of the following: (i) violation of any enactment, statutory Rules and Regulations; (ii) mala fides or ulterior motives to assist or e....
Point of Law : if a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination does not permit re-evaluation or scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re-ev....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
