IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.
Priyanka Dubey – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru Prin.Secy.Higher Edu.Civil Sectt.And Ors. – Respondents
WRIT -C No. -1007064 of 2015
Decided On : 10-07-2024
NEGLIGENCE - EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION - N/A - The court addressed the negligence of Lucknow University in withholding the petitioner's examination results without proper communication or a fair inquiry process. Key legal provisions discussed include the principles of natural justice and the necessity of communicating administrative orders to affected parties, as established in various Supreme Court rulings. The court emphasized that mere possibilities of misconduct are insufficient for punitive actions against students, leading to the conclusion that the university's actions were arbitrary and unjustified.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a B.Sc. 3rd year student, had her examination results withheld by Lucknow University due to allegations of manipulated answer sheets. Despite her repeated inquiries and a show cause notice issued years later, the university failed to provide a fair hearing or communicate decisions regarding her case, ultimately leading to her inability to sit for subsequent examinations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the university's actions were in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The lack of communication regarding the cancellation of the petitioner's examinations and the absence of a definitive finding of misconduct rendered the university's proceedings illegal and arbitrary.
Issues: Whether the university's withholding of the petitioner's examination results and subsequent actions violated principles of natural justice and whether the decisions made were legally valid.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that administrative orders must be communicated to the affected party to be effective. The absence of a definitive finding of misconduct and the failure to provide the petitioner with necessary materials for her defense were critical in determining the illegality of the university's actions.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, quashing the university's order dated 15.11.2014, except for the clause ordering an inquiry into the non-communication of the previous order. The university was ordered to pay the petitioner a compensation of two lakhs for the negligence and distress caused.
JUDGMENT :
Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J.
1. Heard Shri Sidharth Nath Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Avinash Chandra, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondent no.1 and Shri Savitra Vardhan Singh, appearing on behalf of the Lucknow University- respondent no. 2 to 5.
2. The present case clearly demonstrates callous and negligence attitude and actions of the Lucknow University with regard to the petitioner, who was a student of B.Sc. 3rd year and had appeared in the examinations in 2009. The result of the said examinations were declared, but the result of the petitioner was withheld. Subsequently, the petitioner came to know that the result has been withheld on account of certain allegations attributable to the petitioner, according to which the answersheets were manipulated in six subjects.
3. Despite repeated attempts made by the petitioner, no order was passed by the respondent-University either scoring her answersheets in the aforesaid subjects nor passing any order which may indicate her misconduct due to which the said examination was cancelled. No order was passed by the Lucknow University till a show cause notice was given to the petitioner for the first time on 20.02.2010. In the said show cause notice dated 20.2.2010 passed by the office of the Controller of Examination the petitioner was asked to respond to the allegations with regard to the subjects which were coded as S-648, S649, S-650, S-671, S-672 and S-673 the answersheets were transplanted and the petitioner was directed to respond to the said allegations within a period of 15 days. The petitioner duly responded to the said show cause notice by a reply dated 12.03.2010 and denied the said allegations and further stated that she was never made aware of the aforesaid allegations. After submitting a reply on 12.03.2010, the respondent University did not communicate any decision in pursuance of the show cause notice given to the petitioner.
4. It seems that the Lucknow University on receiving the response of the petitioner had constituted an Examination Committee to take a decision with regard to the petitioner. It has been informed that the said committee came to a decision on 21.05.2012 to the effect that the petitioner be permitted to appear as an exempted candidate in the year 2012-13 and also took a decision that her examinations in the year 2009 stood cancelled. There is no dispute that the decision of the examination committee dated 21.05.2012 was never communicate to the petitioner and it is on account of the said fact that the petitioner could not even appear in 2012-13 examination. It seems that respondent University realised their mistake that the order of the Examination Committee dated 21.05.2012 was never communicated to the petitioner, and in the meanwhile the petitioner had approached this Court by filing a writ petition being Writ Petition No.6992 (MS) of 2014. It is during hearing of the said writ petition, Counsel for the Lucknow University informed the Court that a decision in this regard has been taken by the University on 15.11.2014. When the counsel for the petitioner was informed about the fresh decision having been taken by the Lucknow University, he prayed for dismissal of the the writ petition as withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh petition assailing the decision of the Lucknow University. It is the subsequent decision dated 15.11.2014 passed by the Examination Committee that the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.
5. A perusal of the order dated 15.11.2014 would clearly indicates that there is no finding the petitioner had in fact transplanted the answersheets and was guilty of misconduct. For sake of convenience, paragraph No.1(v) of the said order is quoted herein below:-
^^ijh{kk lfefr dh cSBd fnukad 21-05-2012 dks ch0,l0lh0 r`rh; o"kZ dh Nk=k fiz;adk nqcs dh o"kZ 2008&09 ds izdj.k ds lEcU/k esa lfefr }kjk xgu fopkj foe'kZ fd;k x;k rFkk loZlEefr ls ;g fu.kZ;
Revajeetu Builders and Developers versus Narayanswamy and sons and others (2009) 10 SCC 84
Laxminarayan R. Bhattad v. State of Maharashtra
Bachhittar Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1963 SC 395
Sethi Auto Service Station vs. DDA (2009) 1 SCC 180
Bachhittar Singh v. State of Punjab and another AIR 1963 SC 395
the State of Punjab and another v. Resham Singh and others AIR 1966 SC 1313
An administrative order is only effective when communicated to the affected party, and failure to provide a fair hearing or necessary materials constitutes a violation of natural justice.
Courts should not interfere in academic matters of educational institutions, unless or until same does not pass test of reasonableness or are violative of principles of natural justice.
If a candidate is found in mala fide possession of any material as indicated in the Rules, which is relevant to the subject examination, he shall be disqualified from appearing in any of the Universi....
The court held that the decision of the respondent authorities to disqualify the petitioner under Regulation 5(a) without finding mala-fide possession of material was non-speaking and cryptic, and fa....
Compliance with statutory provisions and principles of natural justice is essential in disciplinary proceedings, and any dismissal or penalty imposed must be in accordance with the law.
The court affirmed that admissions obtained through fraud are invalid, emphasizing that principles of natural justice do not apply in such cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in domestic enquiries, the petitioner is not entitled to assistance of counsel as a matter of right, and the punishment of detention ordered b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.