JUDGMENT :

ROBIN PHUKAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.K. Deori, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Pertin, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. T.Y. Bhutia, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4; Mr. A. Apang, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

2. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is instituted by the petitioner, namely, Shri Joram Hania seeking following reliefs:

(i) To direct the respondent No. 1 for review, re-verification of the “Answer Key” of Question No. 18 and 96 of Elementary Mathematics Paper by an expert resource person.

(ii) To direct the respondent No. 1 to award 1[one] mark to the petitioner if the answer of the petitioner is OMR Sheet of Question No. 18 and 96 of Elementary Mathematics Question Paper is found correct after re-verification by Expert person.

(iii) To direct the respondent No. 1 to recommend the petitioner for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspect [Civil/IRBN].

BACKGROUND FACTS:

3. The petitioner, namely, Shri Joram Hania had applied for and participated in the recruitment process initiated by Arunachal