VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Santosh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Mewa Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by plaintiff against judgment and decree dated 10.3.2006 passed by District Judge, Una in Civil Appeal No. 83 of 2003, titled Santosh Kumari Vs. Malkiat Singh and others, whereby judgment and decree dated 21.8.2003 passed in Case No. 285/I of 1999, titled as Santosh Kumari Vs. Malkiat Singh and others, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction and for permanent injunction, has been affirmed.
2. Case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that she is owner in possession of Khasra No. 5064/3 and 5064/2 measuring 0-09-99 hectares situated in village Bhera, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. which was purchased by her from defendant No. 1 through registered sale deed dated 18.6.1999, whereas defendants have no right, title or interest in the suit land and defendants No. 2 and 3 causing interference in the suit land and further that during pendency of suit they have forcibly encroached upon the suit land marked as letters A, B, C, D and E which is part of suit land compromised in Khasra No. 5064/2 and, therefore, plaintiff has prayed for decree for permanent prohibitory injunction with posse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.