SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 597

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PRANAY VERMA
Bagdiram – Appellant
Versus
Ramsingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kailash Kaushal

ORDER :

1. This appeal under Section 100 of the CPC has been preferred by the appellants/defendants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below whereby the claim of plaintiffs/respondents for permanent injunction has been decreed.

2. As per the plaintiffs, by a registered sale deed dated 29.03.1961 Jagannath, Daulatramji and Dhannaji had purchased survey No.72/82 area 4.31 acre from Pyara S/o Tulsiji Chamar. They divided the land amongst themselves subsequently as a result of which survey No.72/82/2 fell to the share of Jagannath, survey No.72/82/3 fell to the share of Dhannaji and survey No.72/82/1 fell to the share of Daulatramji. The same were accordingly recorded in the revenue records. The plaintiffs are in possession of survey No. 72/82/2 area 0.809 hectare fallen to the share of their predecessor Jagannath which is the suit land but the defendants are attempting to encroach over the same which has necessitated filing of the suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession over the same.

3. The defence of the defendants was that they are the owners of survey No.3 area 2.561 acre which is an entirely disti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top