JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The informant made a complaint before the police stating that she was married and was residing with her husband. She was introduced to the present petitioner. The petitioner called the informant and asked her to meet him. The informant met the accused/petitioner. The petitioner proposed to marry her. The informant said that she was already married and could not marry. The petitioner continued to talk to the informant. He took her to a hotel where he entered into sexual relations with the informant on the assurance of the marriage. He asked her to divorce her husband and marry him. The informant and her husband filed a divorce petition on 30.05.2019 and the same was decided on 04.12.2019. The informant contacted the petitioner; however, he changed his mobile phone. The informant traced the petitioner. He told her that he wanted to use her and never intended to marry her. He went to the house of the petitioner where the petitioner’s father told her to take some money and forget the petitioner. The police registered the F.I.R. and conducted the investigation. The police found that the petitioner never intended to marry the informant as she belonged to a di