IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Pradeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others - Respondents
CWP No.9161 of 2023
Decided on : 22-11-2023
Inter-District Transfer - Junior Basic Teacher - The court directed the education authority to consider the petitioner's request for inter-district transfer due to extreme medical exigencies of his wife, despite the petitioner not meeting the eligibility criteria under the existing policy.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Junior Basic Teacher, sought inter-district transfer due to extreme medical exigencies of his wife. The petitioner had not completed the required five years of service as per the Inter-District Transfer Policy.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the education authority to consider the petitioner's representation for transfer, taking into account the medical exigencies and other hardships, and to examine the case for relaxation of norms if required.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could claim benefit of inter-district transfer despite not meeting the eligibility criteria, and whether the existing policy could be relaxed in case of extreme medical exigencies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found it necessary to consider the petitioner's case for transfer in light of the extreme medical exigencies, and directed the education authority to examine the case for relaxation of norms if required.
Final Decision: The court directed the education authority to decide the petitioner's representation for transfer within three weeks, considering the medical exigencies and other hardships, without adjudicating on the merits of the matter.
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition, seeking Inter-District Transfer from Shimla District to Sirmaur District, being Junior Basic Teacher (JBT), with the following prayers:-
(ii) That the Respondent dept. especially respondent no. 2 be directed to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure P-3) on compassionate and sympathetic grounds, more than three years rendered by the petitioner at difficult area sub-cadre, in a time bound manner.”
3. In the background of the reliefs, as prayed for, Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is working as a JBT on contract basis in Government Primary School, Gaunth, Education Block, Kupvi, which is a hard/difficult area from 22.09.2020 and in view of the extreme medical exigencies of his wife, who is suffering from Transvaginal and Transabdominal and is under constant treatment from the Medical Experts, as per Annexure P-4 (colly), the petitioner had made a representation for his Inter-District Transfer, dated 26.09.2020, then on 14.10.2022, Annexure P-2 (colly), and representation recently on 21.09.2023, Annexure P-3, keeping in view the medical exigencies of wife and other peculiar family circumstances.
4. Per contra, Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, submits that as per Inter-District Transfer Policy, notified on 20th November, 2021, Annexure P-6, the petitioner is not eligible for Inter-District Transfer, as he has not completed five years of regular/contractual service as required under the s aid Policy.
5. In rebuttal, Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, learned counsel, submits that the petitioner is only seeking consideration of his case for Inter-District Transfer, by relaxing or otherwise, notwithstanding the fact, that the petitioner is not eligible in terms of the existing Policy, Annexure P-6, but only in view of the extreme medical exigencies of his wife.
6. Without going into the rival contentions, in view of the including fact as to whether the petitioner can claim benefit of Inter-District Transfer, dehors the Policy or not, coupled with the fact as to whether in case of extreme medical exigencies, the aforesaid Policy, Annexure P-6, could be relaxed and if yes, under what circumstances.
7. In this background and as prayed for by Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, learned counsel, this Court directs respondent No.2-Director, Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, to decide the latest representation dated 21.09.2023, Annexure P-3, after taking into accounts the medical exigencies, Annexure P-4 and other hardships, at its own level or by taking up the matter with respondent No.1-Principal Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, for examining/considering this case for relaxation of norms, if so required, within three weeks from today.
8. Needless to say that, this Court has not adverted to the rival contentions and merits of the matter and all Questions of facts and law are left open.
As aforesaid, the writ petition as well as the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly.
In cases of extreme medical exigencies, the court may direct the consideration of inter-district transfer requests and examination for relaxation of eligibility norms.
Petitioner's right to request a transfer for compassionate grounds acknowledged; authority directed to consider representation sympathetically.
No vested right to inter-district transfer for district cadre employees; authority's discretionary rejection valid if reasoned on basis of vacancies in parent district to safeguard students' academic....
The court emphasized the importance of considering transfer requests in accordance with the specific clauses of the transfer policy and ensuring equal and non-discriminatory application of the policy....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.