Back
SATYEN VAIDYA
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
1. The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:
(ii) That Annexure A-4 may kindly be quashed and set-aside with the directions to re-draw the seniority list whereby inducting the names of the applicants at a proper place over and above the private respondents striatum wise, whereby giving the benefit to each applicant of his contractual service from the date of his initial appointment in the Department.
(iii) That the respondent department may kindly be directed to pay all consequential benefits to the applicants from the due dates with interest @ 12% per annum till the date
Contractual employment made in accordance with R&P Rules is liable to be considered for the purposes of seniority, and the initial appointment, even if temporary, if made in terms of prevalent recrui....
Seniority in public service must be determined by the date of first appointment, not by roster points, as per statutory rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the seniority of the petitioners should be counted from the date of their regularization as Assistant Engineers. The court also emphasized the....
Seniority assigned to any employee could not be changed after a lapse of 7 years, though even on merit it was found that seniority of the petitioner therein had correctly been fixed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
