TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUSHIL KUKREJA
Tanvi Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Power Corp. Ltd. – Respondent
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive reliefs:-
(ii) That the respondents be directed to release the salary of applicant for the period w.e.f. 01.01.2019 to 22.02.2019.
2. The undisputed facts of the present case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Finance Officer on contract basis w.e.f. 23.09.2008 and subsequently his services came to be regularized and she was promoted as Manager (Finance) on 01.01.2017.
3. The petitioner while in service was in family way and had given due notice to respondent No. 3 on 03.07.2018 that she would be proceeding on maternity leave for 180 days w.e.f. 04.07.2018 to 20.12.2018 under “The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961”, with a specific request to allow her the benefit flowing out of the notification issued by the Finance Department of the Government of Himachal Pradesh dated 2
Deepika Singh vs Central Administrative Tribunal And Others [(2022) 7 SCR 557]
Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v. Workmen
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Female Workers (Muster Roll) & Anr. (2000) 3 SCC 224
Rattan Lal and others vs. State of Haryana and others reported in 1985 (3) SLR 548
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.