RANJAN SHARMA
Avtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Bail petitioner [Avtar Singh], has come up before this Court, seeking pre-arrest bail, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C] originating from the FIR No. 33 of 2024 dated 30.03.2024, registered at Police Station Gagret, District Una [H.P.], under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to as the NDPS Act).
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. Case set up by Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Learned Advocate, is that the Deputy Superintendent of Police [Probationer] alongwith other police personnel, were on patrolling-checking duty with respect to Illicit Liquor, Narcotics and Illicit Mining in their Government vehicle bearing registration No. HP72C-0819 towards village Kaloh, Tehsil Ghanari, District Una, Himachal Pradesh. While the police party was on patrolling/checking duty, as referred to above, secret information was received by the police at about 3:00 P.M on 30.03.2024 that the bail-petitioner had cultivated Opium [Afim-Dode] on his adjacent- adjoining land by fencing the same, leading to the registration of FIR No.33 of 2024, dated 30.03.2024 against the bail petitioner.
2(i) The case of the
Ram Govind Upadhyay versus Sudarshan Singh (2002) 3 SCC 598
Saumya Churasia versus Directorate of Enforcement, Criminal Appeal No 3840 of 2023
Sushila Aggarwal versus State -NCT Delhi
Ansar Ahmad versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia versus State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar versus Rajesh Ranjan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.