VIRENDER SINGH
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sadh Ram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract for the sale of land and earnest money paid. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. plaintiff's readiness to perform and invoke contract terms. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. defendant's contestation and claims of plaintiff's misconduct. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. identification of issues for adjudication. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. presentation of evidence by both parties. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. defendant's evidence against plaintiff's claims. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. legal principles surrounding 'time is of the essence' in property contracts. (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 8. plaintiff's injunction claim and implications on performance of contract. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 9. conclusion and directions regarding contract fulfillment. (Para 86 , 88) |
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
PlaintiffDarshan Singh has filed the suit for specific performance of contract dated 22.10.2005, against the defendant, with regard the land measuring 7 kanals 13 marlas, comprised in Khewat Khatauni No.59/65, Khasra No.173/105, as per Jamabandi for the years 20012002, situated in Mauza Gogharwal, Pargana and Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as ‘the suit land’).
2. In
Gomathinayagam Pillai v. Pallaniswami Nadar
Govind Prasad Chaturvedi v. Hari Dutt Shastri
Indira Kaur v. Sheo Lal Kapoor
Jamshed Khodaram Irani v. Burjorji Dhunjibhai
Rattan Arya v. State of Tamil Nadu
Motor General Traders v. State of A.P. (1984) 1 SCC 222
Malpe Vishwanath Acharya v. State of Maharashtra
K.S. Vidyanadam and Others vs. Vairavan
Swarnam Ramachandran & Another Vs. Aravacode Chakungal Jayapalan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.