SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1463

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK GUPTA
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Rajender Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Gupta, J.

1. Present Regular Second Appeal was earlier disposed of by a Coordinate Bench of this Court by way of order dated 16.01.2019. However, the said order was challenged by the respondent of the appeal before Hon'ble Supreme Court by filing Civil Appeal No.4222 of 2023 (arising out of SLP-C-19102-2019) and by way of order dated 06.07.2023, Hon'ble Supreme Court has set aside the order dated 16.01.2019 of this Court and has remanded the matter with the direction to examine the appeal afresh on the question of entitlement of the plaintiff to enforce specific performance of the agreement or any other relief. That is how, the present appeal is again before this Court.

2.1 Perusal of the paper-book would reveal that vide an agreement dated 10.04.2006, Raj Singh, the predecessor-in-interest of the defendants (appellants & performa respondent herein) had agreed to sell the suit land to plaintiff-Rajender Singh (respondent No.l herein) and an amount of ?4 lakh was paid as earnest money. Initially, the target date for execution of the sale deed was fixed as 16.08.2006, but with mutual consent, it was extended firstly to 16.12.2006 and thereafter to 31.01.2007. Seeking t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top