SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
Virender Singh, J.
Akhil Rana - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No. 410 of 2025
Decided On : 03-04-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Reeta Hingmang
For the Respondents: Mohinder   Zharaick, Vijay Kumar

IMPORTANT POINT
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited; bail granted when no evidence necessitates custodial interrogation.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 498-A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and 34 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Application for anticipatory bail - Applicant claims false implication in FIR - Interim protection granted earlier made absolute - No evidence for custodial interrogation required - Pre-trial punishment prohibited. (Paras 1 , 14 , 16 , 18 )

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Applicant must join investigation, not leave India without permission, and not influence witnesses - Observations do not reflect on merits of the case. (Paras 19 , 20 )

Facts of the case:

The applicant, apprehending arrest in FIR No.21 of 2025, claims innocence and alleges false implication. The FIR involves allegations of dowry harassment and attempted outraging of modesty by the applicant and co-accused. (Paras 1 , 2 , 6 .1, 6.4)

Findings of Court:

The court found no evidence necessitating custodial interrogation and emphasized that pre-trial punishment is not permissible. The interim protection was made absolute, allowing bail upon conditions. (Paras 14 , 18 )

Issues: The main issues included the necessity of custodial interrogation and the validity of the allegations made against the applicant. (Paras 14 , 15 )

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that without evidence of necessity for custodial interrogation, the applicant should not be punished prior to trial, affirming the principle against pre-trial punishment. (Paras 14 , 16 )

Result: The applicant is ordered to be released on bail, subject to conditions.

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

1. Applicant Akhil Rana, apprehending his arrest, in case FIR No. 21 of 2025, dated 28.01.2025, registered, under Sections 498-A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) has filed the present application, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) with a prayer to direct the Police/ Investigating Officer of Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. to release him on bail, in the event of his arrest.

2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in this case. He has termed the entire allegations, which have been levelled, in the FIR, against him, as false.

3. Apart from this, the applicant has given the history of litigation, which have taken place between him and the complainant, who had lodged the FIR.

4. On the basis of the above facts, the applicant has given certain undertakings, for which, he is ready to abide by, in case, any direction, under Section 482 of the BNSS is issued by this Court.

5. Hence, a prayer has been made that the I.O., Police Station Palampur, may kindly be directed to release the applicant on bail, in the event of his arrest.

6. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that one zero FIR from Police Station Dharampur District Mandi, was received in Police Station, Palampur, District Kangra, for registration of FIR. The said FIR was registered on the statement of Pratima Rana, wherein, she has alleged that she was married to Akhil Rana (applicant), on 15.10.2017. The said marriage was stated to be love-cum-arrange marriage:

6.1. The father of the complainant had given dowry/Stridhan, as per his capacity. In this regard, she has enclosed the list of the dowry with the complaint, which is stated to be in possession of the accused persons. The complaint has been moved against the present applicant, as well as, his parents.

6.2. According to the complainant, the parents of the applicant were not satisfied with the marriage and they were expecting more dowry in the marriage, as according to the complainant, her father is working in the Intelligence Department.

6.3. According to the complainant, the accused used to maltreat and taunt her for bringing less dowry. The parents of the applicant tried to get rid of the complainant, by saying that they can marry their son (applicant) with another girl. She has alleged that accused Sarabeet Singh also keeps evil eye on her.

6.4. According to the complainant, once she was sleeping in her room, accused Sarabjeet Singh tried to outrage her modesty. When, the complainant resisted, then the said accused proclaimed that it is his right. In this regard, she has made complaint to applicant Akhil Rana, but, he had not paid any heed. Thereafter, accused Sarabjeet Singh also tried to forcibly outrage her modesty, despite screaming, accused Kushma Rana, closed the door.

7. On the basis of the above facts, the complainant has prayed that action be taken against the accused persons.

8. After perusing the said status report, interim protection was granted to the applicant on 03.03.2025.

9. In the status report, which was filed later on, it has been mentioned that the applicant has not joined the investigation. As such, a direction was given to the applicant to join the investigation.

10. In the status report, which has been filed today, it has been mentioned that the investigation has been conducted by visiting the house of the applicant. Parents (co-accused) of the applicant had stated that their son Akhil Rana (applicant) had gone to Singapore, in order to attend a course and will return home on 30.03.2025.

11. It has also been mentioned in the status report that on 31.03.2025, the applicant has joined the investigation.

12. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application.

13. Heard.

14. In the status reports, which have been filed in this case, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top