IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Ngawang Nyima - Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 872 of 2025
Decided on : 05-05-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 29-61-1985 - Bail application - Applicant seeks bail during trial for alleged possession of narcotics, claiming false implication and no recovery from him - Investigation completed, charge sheet filed - Contraband not of commercial quantity, thus Section 37 not applicable - Judicial custody deemed unnecessary as trial unlikely to conclude soon - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1 , 11 , 16 , 17 )
(B) Presumption of Innocence - The applicant maintains presumption of innocence as no conviction has been made in prior cases against him. (Paras 10 , 11 )
Facts of the case:
The applicant, arrested on 11.1.2025, claims innocence and no recovery from his possession, with investigation completed and charge sheet filed. Another pending case against him does not affect his presumption of innocence. (Paras 2 , 5 , 9 .5)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant's continued custody serves no purpose as the investigation is complete and the contraband does not meet the threshold for commercial quantity. (Paras 11 , 13 )
Issues: The main issues were whether the applicant's continued detention was justified given the completion of the investigation and the nature of the contraband. (Paras 11 , 13 )
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant should not be punished prior to trial and that the presumption of innocence remains intact, warranting bail under the circumstances. (Paras 14 , 16 )
Result: Bail application allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, Judge
Applicant Ngawang Nyima has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNS S ’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case FIR No. 11 of 2025, dated 11.1.2025, registered under Sections 21, 29- 61-1985 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NDPS Act’), and Section 212 (A) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNS ’), with Police Station, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P.
2. The applicant has pleaded that he is an innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, as he has no concern whatsoever with the alleged offence, for which, he has been arrested, by the police.
3. According to the applicant, no recovery has been effected from his possession. Investigation, in the present case, is stated to be completed. As such, according to the applicant, his custodial interrogation is no longer required by the Police, in this case.
4. It is the case of the applicant that the arrest of the applicant, in the present case, is far from truth, with a view to malign his reputation.
5. As per the applicant, he is in the judicial custody since 11.1.2025.
6. The applicant has tried his luck by moving bail application No. 17-D/XXII/2025, before the Court of learned Special Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., however, the same was dismissed, on 27.2.2025.
7. The applicant, through his counsel, has undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions, to be imposed by this court, in case, he is ordered to be released on bail.
8. On these submissions, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.
9. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 11.1.2025, ASI Suneet Kumar, I.O., Police Station, Dharamshala, alongwith other police officials, was on patrolling duty and duty to detect the crime, relating to excise. When, the I.O. was checking the vehicles on the By pass Chowk, Dharamshala, at about 5:55 p.m., he noticed a motorcycle coming from Mackleodganj, on which, two persons were sitting.
9.1 On seeing the Police party, the motorcyclist got perplexed and tried to turn back the motor-cycle, upon which, ASI Suneet Kumar directed his associates to nab the motorcyclist. In the meanwhile, the pillion rider threw away a small packet, on the left side of the road. Both the persons were nabbed. Registration number of the motor cycle was HP38G-3296.
9.2 On inquiry, the motorcyclist disclosed his name as Yogesh Rana, S/o Rohan Singh, whereas, the pillion rider disclosed his name as Ngawang Nyima, S/o Tashi (applicant). Since, both the persons got perplexed, as such, the I.O. developed suspicion in his mind that the small packet, thrown by the applicant, might be containing some illegal/objectionable thing. As such, he has associated one Kuldeep Singh, who was waiting for the bus, at the spot, as independent witness.
9.3 In the presence of said person, the plastic packet thrown by the applicant was opened. On opening, the same was found to be containing white/light brown granule shaped substance. Both the persons disclosed that the said substance is chitta/heroin. When, ASI Suneet Kumar checked the same, it was found to be chitta on the basis of experience. On weighment, the said chitta was found to be weighing 9.09 grams. Other codal formalities were completed. Thereafter, accused persons were arrested.
9.4 The contraband, so recovered, was sent to SFSL, Junga, from where, the positive report has been received. Investigation, in the present case, is stated to be completed and charge sheet is stated to have been filed in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Kangra at Dharamshala and the case is now stated to be listed, on 5.5.2025, for checking of copies.
9.5 As per the status report, another case bearing FIR No. 155 of 2018, dated 3.8.2018, under Sections 22-61-55 of the
The court granted bail, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the lack of necessity for continued custody after investigation completion.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited; bail may be granted when the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, ensuring the applicant's rights are protected.
The presumption of innocence remains intact despite the registration of a case, and bail is granted when the contraband does not meet the commercial quantity threshold.
Bail cannot be denied as punishment; the absence of prior convictions and the nature of contraband are crucial in granting bail under the NDPS Act.
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
Bail cannot be denied as punishment; presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, and non-commercial quantity of contraband allows for bail under NDPS Act.
The presumption of innocence remains intact despite multiple cases against the applicant, and bail is granted as the quantity of contraband does not constitute 'commercial quantity' under the NDPS Ac....
The court granted bail based on the presumption of innocence, noting that the quantity of contraband did not invoke stricter bail provisions.
Bail cannot be denied based on punishment; presumption of innocence prevails unless proven guilty, especially when the contraband does not meet the commercial quantity threshold.
The court ruled that the applicant's possession of a non-commercial quantity of narcotics allows for bail, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the prohibition of pre-trial punishment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.