IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J.
Abhishek Singh - Applicant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP (M) No. 651 of 2025
Decided On : 01-04-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 21 - Bail application - Applicant seeks bail during trial for possession of 31.24 grams of Chitta/Heroin - Investigation complete; contraband does not constitute commercial quantity - Presumption of innocence upheld despite prior FIR - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1 , 15 , 16 , 17 )
(B) Presumption of Innocence - A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty after trial, and mere registration of a case does not negate this presumption. (Paras 16 )
Facts of the case:
The applicant, Abhishek Singh, was arrested for allegedly possessing 31.24 grams of Chitta/Heroin. He claims innocence and that the investigation is complete. A prior FIR exists against him under the NDPS Act, but he has not been convicted. (Paras 2 , 12 )
Findings of Court:
The court found that the quantity of contraband does not meet the threshold for commercial quantity, allowing bail. (Paras 15 , 17 )
Issues: The main issues were the applicant's innocence, the nature of the contraband, and the implications of a prior FIR on bail eligibility. (Paras 2 , 12 , 16)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, and the nature of the contraband does not invoke the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act. (Paras 16 )
Result: Bail application allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Applicant-Abhishek Singh, has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ' BNSS '), with a prayer to release him on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case FIR No.100 of 2024, dated 07.12.2024, registered, under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), with Police Station Mehatpur, District Una, H.P.
2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, for allegedly possessing 31.24 grams of Chitta/Heroin.
3. As per the applicant, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence, for which, he has been arrested by the police.
4. As per the applicant, investigation, in the present case, is complete and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in the judicial custody.
5. The applicant has given the history of earlier case registered against him vide FIR No.138 of 2019, with Police Station Shambhu, District Patiala, Punjab and the copy of the same has also been annexed with the application.
6. The applicant has also tried his luck by moving similar application, before learned Special Judge, Una, District Una, however, his application was dismissed, vide order dated 1st March, 2025.
7. Highlighting the fact that the applicant is young boy of 22 years, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that keeping the applicant, in the judicial custody, at this tender age, would adversely affect his future.
8. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.
9. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 07.12.2024, accused Abhishek Singh, was intercepted by the I.O., on the basis of secret information and when he was searched, then during search of his motorcycle, Chitta weighing 31.24 grams was recovered.
10. After completion of all codal formalities, the FIR in question was registered and the applicant was arrested.
11. The contraband, so recovered, was sent to SFSL Junga, from where positive report has been received. Thereafter, charge sheet in the Court of learned Special Judge, Una was filed.
12. The relief of bail has been opposed on the ground that against the applicant, FIR No.138 of 2019, has also been registered with Police Station Shambhu (Punjab) under the NDPS Act, for allegedly possessing 220 grams of Chitta. The said case is stated to be pending.
13. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application.
14. Heard.
15. Investigation, in the present case is complete and the contraband allegedly recovered, in this case, does not fall within the definition of commercial quantity, as such, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable, in the present case.
16. So far as the registration of the other case with Police Station Shambhu, is concerned, admittedly, in the said case, the applicant has not been convicted by the competent Court of law. As such, mere registration of the case, does not take away the presumption of innocence, which is still available to the applicant. A person is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, after the trial.
17. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in case FIR No.100 of 2024, dated 07.12.2024, registered, under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, with Police Station Mehatpur, District Una, H.P., on his furnishing personal bond, in the sum of Rs.50,000/-, with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/any Judicial Magistrate First Class, stationed at Una.
18. This order of release, however, shall be subject to the following conditions :-
“a) Applicant shall make himself available for the purpose of interrogation, if so required and regularly attend the trial Court on each and every da
The presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, and the quantity of contraband does not invoke stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act.
The court ruled that the applicant's possession of a non-commercial quantity of narcotics allows for bail, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the prohibition of pre-trial punishment.
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited; bail may be granted when the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, ensuring the applicant's rights are protected.
The presumption of innocence remains intact despite multiple cases against the applicant, and bail is granted as the quantity of contraband does not constitute 'commercial quantity' under the NDPS Ac....
Pre-trial punishment is prohibited, and the presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, allowing bail when investigation is complete and no prior cases exist.
The court ruled that the applicant is entitled to bail as the contraband does not constitute commercial quantity, and pre-trial punishment is prohibited.
The court granted bail based on the presumption of innocence, noting that the quantity of contraband did not invoke stricter bail provisions.
The presumption of innocence remains until conviction, and bail may be granted based on parity with co-accused and absence of commercial quantity of contraband.
The presumption of innocence remains intact despite the registration of a case, and bail is granted when the contraband does not meet the commercial quantity threshold.
Bail cannot be denied as punishment; presumption of innocence remains until proven guilty, and non-commercial quantity of contraband allows for bail under NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.