IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Sher Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
The above-titled petitions are being disposed of by this common order, as, both the petitions have been filed, in the same FIR, i.e. FIR No.43/2018, dated 19.08.2018 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘FIR in question’), registered under Sections 279 and 337 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), with Police Station West, Shimla, H.P.
2. Brief facts, leading to the filing of the above petitions, as per the record, annexed with the petitions, may be summed up, as under:-
2.1. Complainant-Rajesh Kumar (respondent No.2 in CrMMO No.229 of 2025) had made a statement, under Section 154 of CrPC, before the Investigating Officer, disclosing therein that on 19.02.2018, he, along with his sister-Anjana Kumari (respondent No.3 in CrMMO No.229 of 2025), her daughter Raksha, Madan Kumar and Ram Dass, was on their way to Rippon Hospital, in a vehicle, bearing No.HP-35-1595, driven by him.
2.2. At about 08:23 am, when, they reached near power house at NH-205, then, vehicle No.HP93-0372 (bus, belonging to HRTC), being driven by its driver, in rash and negligent manner, hit the car, driven by the complainant, from backside. Resultantly, the car, driven by
The court upheld the validity of a compromise in a criminal case, allowing the quashing of FIR and setting aside of conviction when parties reached a genuine settlement.
A compromise between the parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating minimal chances of successful prosecution.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise, consider....
The genuineness of the compromise and its acceptance by the complainant can lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings, in line with relevant Supreme Court decisions.
Court while exercising power under Section 482 Cr.PC can proceed to compound offence even after recording of judgment of conviction and order of sentence.
A compromise between the parties can lead to the quashing of an FIR when the complainant withdraws allegations, indicating that prosecution would not succeed.
The main legal point established is that the High Court has inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the....
A valid compromise between parties can lead to quashing of FIR in criminal cases, especially when key witnesses exonerate the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.