IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J
Rakesh Narnol – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kumar – Respondent
Judgment :
(Virender Singh, J.)
Petitioner-Rakesh Narnol has filed the present revision petition against the judgment dated 17.01.2022, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No.101-N/10 of 2016, titled as Rakesh Narnol versus Rajesh Kumar & Another.
2. By way of judgment dated 17.01.2022, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed, by the petitioner, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.10.2016, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’), in Criminal Complaint No.79/3 of 2014, titled as Rajesh Kumar versus Rakesh Narnol.
3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.10.2016, learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of one month and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,70,000/- to the complainant.
4. After dismissal of the appeal by the le
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a settlement, allowing the court to set aside the conviction.
Parties can compound offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if settled amicably, leading to acquittal upon compliance with the compounding fee.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach an amicable settlement.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settled their dispute, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a mutual settlement, allowing for acquittal upon payment of a compounding fee.
The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act based on mutual settlement, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner.
Offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded if the parties reach a mutual settlement.
The court allowed the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled the matter, emphasizing the importance of amicable resolution.
The court permitted the compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties settled their dispute, allowing the petitioner to be acquitted.
The court allows compounding of an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act after the parties settle their dispute, provided the compounding fee is deposited as directed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.