IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.
Danvir singh @ Kaddu (Lodged in Central Jail, Ambala (Haryana) - Petitioner
Versus
NCB – Respondent
Cr.MP(M) No.584 of 2025
Decided On : 07-04-2025
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 29, and 60 - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 439 - Bail application in drug trafficking case - Petitioner sought bail after being implicated in the transportation of charas, with co-accused released on bail under similar circumstances - Court considered the prolonged incarceration and lack of substantial evidence against the petitioner - Conditions for bail imposed to ensure presence during trial. (Paras 1, 10, 21, 22)
(B) Bail - Conditions for granting bail - The court emphasized the necessity of imposing conditions to ensure the accused's presence and prevent tampering with evidence, while also considering the rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 22, 24)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with the transportation of 3.650 kilograms of charas, with co-accused having been released on bail. The petitioner argued for bail based on similar cases and the delay in trial. (Paras 1, 10, 21)
Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments for bail, considering the prolonged custody and lack of substantial evidence against him, allowing bail under specific conditions. (Paras 21, 22)
Issues: The main issues included the justification for the petitioner's continued detention compared to co-accused who were released on bail and the conditions necessary for granting bail. (Paras 10, 21)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prolonged incarceration and lack of substantial evidence warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure the accused's presence and prevent interference with the trial process. (Paras 21, 22)
Result: Petition allowed; petitioner released on bail with conditions.
JUDGMENT :
(Vivek Singh Thakur, J.)
Petitioner has approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’), seeking bail in NCB Crime No.47 of 2020, dated 26.09.2020, registered in Police Station Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) Chandigarh, under Sections 8, 20, 29 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NDPS Act’).
2 Status report stands filed.
3 On perusal of the pleadings and the record, it surfaced that on 26.09.2020 a Secret Specific Information was received by Surveillance Assistant of NCB about two persons namely Lakhan and Rahul with regard to transportation/smuggling of charas in vehicle No.HR-68B-6022 and their probable location between 2.00 p.m. and 2.30 p.m. near Police Station Swarghat. The said information was reduced into writing and was put before the Superintendent, Chandigarh Zonal Unit, who approved it at about 7.00 a.m. on 26.09.2020 and constituted a Team of NCB Officers to intercept the aforesaid vehicle by reaching at Swarghat Chowk for search and seizure of the charas on the basis of secret information.
4 NCB Team, with independent witnesses, set up a Nakka at about 1.30 p.m. at Swarghat and at about 2.15 p.m., vehicle bearing registration No.HR-68B-6022 was noticed coming from Kullu side which was matching with description received in secret information. Therefore, vehicle was signaled to stop and after introduction by the NCB Team and independent witnesses, by showing Departmental Identity Card, three persons, occupants of the Mahindra Pickup, were asked about their introduction, who disclosed themselves as Lakhan, Rahul and Prem Pal. On disclosure of co-accused persons and Rahul, search of the vehicle was conducted by NCB Team and 3.650 kilograms charas was recovered from the vehicle, which was seized by following prescribed procedure. Vehicle was taken into custody alognwith loaded Apple therein.
5 As per NCB case, during interrogation, after arrest of occupants of the vehicle, Rahul was found juvenile and Prem Pal was not found involved in commission of offence and, thus, Prem Pal was discharged. Whereas, Rahul and Lakhan were arrested and during interrogation, Lakhan had disclosed that they had procured the recovered contraband from Lal Chand alias Lallu. Rahul had also endorsed the version of co-accused Lakhan in his separate revelation.
6 It is further case of NCB that on the basis of disclosure made by Lakhan, house of accused Praveen Kumar was searched and statement of accused Praveen Kumar was recorded, wherein Praveen Kumar had accepted his role in trafficking the charas with further disclosure that he had conspired with Danvir Singh alias Kaddu and Ranjeet Bhardwaj alias Bunty in trafficking of charas and Prem Pal was arrested on 27.09.2020. Whereas, Rahul was produced before Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bilaspur on 28.09.2020, Lakhan and Praveen Kumar were produced before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur, alongwith case property, inventory and relevant documents, after their medical examination. During police custody of the aforesaid accused persons, Apples impounded alongwith seized vehicle, used for trafficking of charas, being perishable items, were auctioned in open market at Bilaspur and sale proceed of the same was enclosed with the complaint.
7 On the basis of material came in the light during interrogation, Lal Chand was asked by the NCB Team to join investigation, who had appeared before the NCB Investigating Team on 25.01.2021 and his statement was recorded. He has confessed his acquaintance with Danvir Singh and Praveen Kumar and according to him, Danvir Singh had asked him to bring charas from Lal Chand and for that purpose, petitioner Danvir Singh had given him Rs.1,55,000/- on 24.09.2020 and as such Lal Chand had conspired with petitioner Danvir Singh and co-accused Praveen Kumar to get charas through Lakhan in Mahindra Pickup.
8 It is the case of prosecuti
AI
Prolonged incarceration and lack of substantial evidence justified granting bail, with conditions imposed to ensure presence during trial.
Period of detention is also a relevant factor for considering bail application alongwith other factors.
Petitioner has been found involved in commission of heinous crime of such a nature which is not only ruining individuals, but also damaging families, society and Nation.
Point of Law : Grant of Bail - Object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused person at his trial by reasonable amount of bail.
In cases of successive bail petitions, after dismissal of earlier bail petition(s), the petitioner has to demonstrate substantial change in circumstances and such change is of such a magnitude to con....
While deciding petition for bail viz. prima facie case, nature and gravity of accusation, punishment involved, apprehension of repetition of offence and witnesses being influenced.
Object of the bail is to secure the attendance of the accused in the trial and the proper test to be applied in the solution of the question whether bail should be granted or refused is whether it is....
Point of Law : Court has to keep in mind nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support thereof, severity of the punishment, which conviction will entail, character of the accused, circumstance....
Prolonged incarceration without trial violates the right to personal liberty under Article 21, necessitating the grant of bail even under stringent provisions like the NDPS Act if no reasonable groun....
Prolonged pre-trial detention without a clear and prima facie case warrants bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the right to personal liberty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.