SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA 
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Vinod Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No. 12 of 2025 Decided On : 07-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Javed Khan
For the Respondents: Mohinder Zharaick, Rajinder Singh

The presumption of innocence and completion of investigation justified granting bail, emphasizing that pre-trial punishment is prohibited.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 61(2) - Bail application - Applicant seeks bail in a case involving serious allegations of conspiracy and rape - The applicant claims innocence and has provided undertakings for bail conditions - The court considers the presumption of innocence and the completion of investigation - The court allows bail, emphasizing that pre-trial punishment is prohibited. (Paras 1, 16, 15)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court sets conditions for bail, including availability for interrogation, non-tampering with evidence, and restrictions on leaving the country. (Paras 17)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of being involved in a conspiracy to commit rape, with the prosecutrix alleging that she was abducted and assaulted by another individual known to her. The applicant was identified as the driver of the vehicle used in the crime. (Paras 7.13, 7.14)

Findings of Court:
The court finds that the applicant's continued custody is not justified given the completion of the investigation and the presumption of innocence. (Paras 12, 13)

Issues: The main issues addressed include the applicant's role in the alleged crime and the appropriateness of granting bail given the serious nature of the allegations. (Paras 11, 15)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's presumption of innocence and the lack of necessity for custodial interrogation warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing that pre-trial punishment is not permissible. (Paras 15, 16)

Result: Bail application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

1. Applicant-Vinod Singh, has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release him on bail, in case FIR No. 249 of 2024, dated 07.11.2024, registered under Sections 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), with Police Station Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P.

2. According to the applicant, he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, as he has nothing to do with the alleged offences.

3. As per the applicant, he has no role to play in the alleged crime and has not involved in it.

4. Apart from this, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, ordered to be released, on bail, during the pendency of the trial.

5. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the application.

6. In this case prosecutrix has been ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2, on 2.1.2025 and notices were ordered to be served upon her, through SHO Police Station, Nurpur.

7. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 07.11.2024, the prosecutrix, along with her mother, appeared before the Police and made a complaint, mentioning therein that she is resident of the address, as mentioned, in the complaint.

7.1. According to her, her father is a labourer by profession. For the last four months, from the date of making the complainant, she is allegedly learning computer at Gangath. On 06.11.2024, after attending the computer classes, the prosecutrix was on her way to her home, on foot.

7.2. At about 1.30 p.m., in the afternoon, when, the prosecutrix reached a secluded place near Bera Ground, then a J.K. number car came there and the driver had stopped the car near the prosecutrix. Another person was sitting in the car, who had snatched the phone from the prosecutrix.

7.3. The said boy was earlier known to the prosecutrix, as, he was her friend through instagram, a social media App. The prosecutrix used to talk with said boy on instagram.

7.4. The said boy disclosed his name as Dinesh @ Sunny, resident of Vasauli, Jammu and Kashmir. Not only this, the said boy has also given his mobile number to her, thorugh which, they remained in touch with each other.

7.5. The prosecutrix has further alleged in the complaint that Dinesh @ Sunny dragged her inside the car and directed the driver to drive the car towards her house. When the said act of accused Dinesh was resisted by the prosecutrix, her mouth was gagged and the car was driven towards Forest side at secluded place, where, accused Dinesh @ Sunny directed the driver to park the car on the side of the road.

7.6. Consequently, the driver acted on the direction of accused Sunny. Thereafter, accused Sunny dragged the prosecutrix out of the car and took her towards the bushes on the side of the road. She was raped twice. Although, the prosecutrix raised alarm, but, no habitation was there, as such, no one could hear her alarm.

7.7. Thereafter, accused Sunny made her to sit in the car and directed the driver to take the car to Tallu. Consequently, the driver drove the car towards Tallu. One kilometer short to Tallu, Sunny thrown the prosecutrix out of the car. Thereafter, the driver took vehicle towards Tallu. Sunny had allegedly recorded the Video.

7.8. After reaching home, the prosecutrix disclosed this fact to her mother. Thereafter, she has made the complaint

7.9. On the basis of the above facts, the police registered the FIR, in question, and the police machinery swung into motion.

7.10. During investigation, on the identification of the prosecutrix, the spot was visited and the statements witnesses under Section 180 of the BNSS were recorded. Thereafter, team of DFU, Nurpur, inspected the spot and physical evidence, so found, was also taken i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top