Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the petition and allegations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against quashing the fir (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the legal principles surrounding economic offenses (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. conclusion denying the petition to quash the fir (Para 11 , 15) |
| 5. conditions under which firs can be quashed (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The petitioners have filed the present petition to quash FIR No. 144 of 2010, dated 17.04.2010, registered at Police Station Nurpur, District Kangra, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471, 120B, 452, 323, 506, and 147 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and the consequent proceedings arising out of the FIR.
2. As per the FIR, late Smt. Kalawati had executed a Will. Another Will stated to have been executed by her was propounded by Vijay Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Vinay Kumar, Rahul and Raja, which was stated to be forged. The police registered the FIR and conducted the investigation. It was found during the investigation that the person, who wrote the signatures on the admitted document did not put the signatures on the disputed Will. The
Quashing of FIRs for serious economic offences, such as forgery, cannot be justified by private settlements due to their implications on societal interests.
Economic offences involving cheating, forgery and impersonation cannot be quashed under inherent powers based on compromise due to their societal impact and harm to public financial interests.
The court reinforced that economic offences with societal implications should not be quashed based on civil settlements.
Economic offences involving forgery and cheating cannot be quashed under CrPC Section 482 on compromise basis due to societal impact and public interest in prosecution.
Serious economic offences, such as forgery and corruption, cannot be quashed based on private settlements due to their impact on society and public interest.
The court emphasized the wide amplitude of inherent powers under section 482 of Cr.P.C. and the principles governing the exercise of such powers, highlighting the nature and gravity of the offence, p....
Offences involving forgery and societal impact cannot be quashed based on compromise.
The exercise of inherent power for quashing the FIR and all consequential proceedings is justified to secure the ends of justice, especially when the compromise is voluntary and not secured through c....
The court emphasized that inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly, particularly in serious offences, to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
