SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HP) 423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, Rakesh Kainthla, JJ.
 
Gurdev Singh @ Debu and others - Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 520 of 2016 with Cr. Appeal Nos. 492, 513, 514, 519 of 2016 and Cr. Appeal No. 126 of 2017. 
Decided on : 24-06-2024
 

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, Mr. H.S. Rana, Ms. Rajvinder Sandhu and Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocates Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate
For the Respondent/State:Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.

The court established that eyewitness identifications were unreliable and the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to sustain convictions under various criminal charges.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 120-B, 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 427, 201; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27 - Conspiracy and murder - Conviction of appellants under various sections set aside due to unreliable eyewitness testimonies and lack of corroborative evidence regarding identity and recoveries. Blood samples from the crime scene inconclusive. (Paras 1-90)

(B) Appeal - Reversal of conviction - Court emphasized that findings of the trial court are unsustainable owing to multiple discrepancies in the prosecution's case, including ante-timing of the FIR and questionable recoveries. (Paras 90-92)

Facts of the case:
Appellants were convicted following a violent incident resulting in a murder; evidence presented was contested as unreliable due to witness inconsistencies regarding identity and events on the ground.

Findings of Court:
High Court concluded that the evidence failed to reliably establish participation in the crime, leading to acquittal.

Issues: Main issues include credibility of eyewitness accounts, the legitimacy of recoveries, and whether evidence sufficiently supports the charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that reasonable doubt exists concerning the identification and prosecution's handling of evidence, affirming the presumption of innocence.

Result: Appeals allowed; the accused acquitted.

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.9.2016, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Solan, District Solan, H.P. vide which the appellants (accused persons before the learned Trial Court) were convicted and sentenced as under:-

Under Section 302 of IPCTo suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo imprisonment for two years each.
Under Section 25 of the Arms Act read with Section 34 of IPC.To suffer rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of the fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months each.
Under Section 27 of the Arms Act read with Section 34 of IPC.To suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of payment of the fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months each.

(Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeals are that the police presented a challan against the accused persons before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 427, 201, 120-B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC), Sections 25 and 27 of the ARMS ACT and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. It was asserted that an intimation was given to Check Post Bagheri on 4.4.2013 that one person was lying on the road in serious condition on Toll Tax Barrier Bagheri after a quarrel. Inspector/SHO Bir Bahadur (PW42), SI Ramesh Chand, SI Mehar Singh, PSI Ravinder, ASI Ramesh Kumar, ASI Sanjay Kumar, HC Prem Lal, Constable Balwant, Constable Ajay Kumar, Constable Nitesh Kumar, Constable Harpreet Singh and Constable Chet Ram went to Bagheri Toll Tax Barrier in an official vehicle bearing registration No. HP-12B-0100, being driven by Constable Kapil Mohan. ASI Mohan Singh (PW27) and ASI Brij Lal (PW24) were present at the spot. No person was found on the spot. It was found after the inquiry that the injured was taken to the First Referral Unit (FRU), Nalagarh. ASI Brij Lal was directed to preserve the spot. Bir Bahadur Dy. SP reached the FRU, Nalagarh where Sukhdev Singh (PW16) made a statement before the police, stating that he had been employed in Toll Tax Barrier, Bagheri since 1.4.2013. He was discharging his duties from 8.00 PM of 3.4.2013 till 8.00 AM of 4.4.2013. Naresh @ Gutti (since deceased), Pappu, Laddi, Surinder and Baba were posted with him. Informant Naresh, Laddi and Jagdish Singh (PW17) were talking to each other in the parking near the dhaba. Sunil Kumar (PW1) and Avtar Singh (PW2) reached the spot in their Bolero vehicle. The informant had worked with Sunil at Ghara-Mora Barrier. Jona, Kankal, Todu, Bhuru, Honey, Bau and 2-3 persons came to the spot at about 11.30 PM. Kankal and Jona attacked the informant and other persons with pistols and others attacked them with swords and rods. They damaged the windowpanes of the vehicle of Sunil. Todu, Bhuru, Honey, and Bau had swords/kirpans in their hand. Rinku had a stick with him and other persons, who could not be identified, had rods with them. Kankal and Jona had fired at the informant and other persons. Everyone ran to save his life. Naresh alias Gutti ran towards the Toll Tax Barrier but the assailants followed him to the barrier. The informant heard the sound of 2-3 gunshots. He and Jagdish went to the toll barrier after some time and found Naresh lying in an injured condition in the middle of the road. He was taken to Nalagarh for treatment. Avtar Singh and Jagdish Singh also reached the spot. They had sustained injuries. They were taken to the hospital. Naresh alias Gutti succumbed to his injuries on the way. The assailants had quarreled with deceased Naresh and FIR was registered against the assailant in Police Stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top