IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,J, SUSHIL KUKREJA,J
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Urao – Respondent
Sushil Kukreja, J.
1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant/State under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 22.04.2015, passed by learned Sessions Judge (Forests), Shimla, H.P., in Sessions Trial RBT No. 11-S/7 of 2013, whereby the accused persons, namely Sudhir Urao and Suresh Urao (respondents No. 1 and 2 herein) were acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “IPC ”).
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, as per the prosecution story, can be summarized as under:
2(a). On 04.11.2012, around 11:40 p.m., police of Police Post, Mashobra, was informed telephonically by a person from his mobile, having mobile number 98056-51032, that a dead body was lying near the rain-shelter near Jablanda Crusher. In sequel to the above information police at Police Station Dhalli was informed. Thereafter, the police rushed to the spot and statement of Shri Anil Rathour (complainant), under Section 154 Cr.P.C. was recorded. The complainant stated that on 04.11.2012, around 01:00 p.m., one Inder Singh informed him at Baldeyan Polling Booth that at Pa
Muralidhar alias Gidda & another Vs. State of Karnatka reported in
Rajesh Prasad vs. State of Bihar & another
H.D. Sundara & others vs. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Vijay Shankar Vs. State of Haryana
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Raj Kumar
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra
Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.