SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Guru Dev – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : N.K. Thakur, Divya Raj Singh
For the Respondent: Ajit Sharma

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.

1. The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 29.2.2026, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, HP (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction dated 6.12.2014 and order of sentence dated 8.12.2014, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandi, District Mandi, HP, were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the police presented a challan against the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 , 337 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ). It was asserted that Suman Kumar (PW8) was going towards Beat No. 2 on 13.6.2010, at about 9.20 AM. A truck bearing registration No. HP-72-1603 came from Mandi at a high speed and hit the motorcycle bearing registration No. HP-31A-2360, which was moving ahead of the truck. The motorcycle was dragged for a distance of 80 mtrs. The driver stopped the truck at some distance and ran away from the spot. The accident occurred due to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top