IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
Ramesh Chand - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. Revision No.193 of 2015
Decided On : 14-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident caused by truck hitting motorcycle negligently. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution witnesses prove case; accused denies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. lower courts convict for rash driving and death. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. accused contests identity, negligence; state defends conviction. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. revisional court limits to patent errors, no re-appreciation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. unchallenged testimony identifies accused as driver. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. site plan shows motorcycle on wrong side. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. witnesses confirm no truck wrong-side driving. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. right-side driving violates road rules, negligent. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. high speed alone not negligence proof. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 11. witness negligence opinions inadmissible. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 12. no evidence proves accused's rashness. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 13. fleeing scene violates duty to aid. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 14. acquit ipc charges; uphold mv act conviction. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 02.06.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.(learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.12.2010, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jubbal, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan against the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (M.V. Act). It was asserted that Arun Kumar (since deceased) was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No. HP-10A-0606 on 10.06.2009, and the informant Satish Kumar (PW-1) was sitting as a pillion rider. A truck bearing registration No. HP11B-4617 came from the opposite side at a high speed and hit the motorcycle at Bohli Kainchi at about 5:30 p.m.. The truck sped away towards Hatkoti. Arun Kumar and Satish Kumar fell and sustained multiple injuries. The accident occurred due to the negligence of the truck driver. An intimation was given to the police. The police recorded an entry (Ext.PW-11/A) in the Daily Diary. HC Amrit Singh (PW-15), Constable Shishi Ram (PW-12) and Constable Sunil Kumar went to the spot to verify the correctness of the information. HC Amrit Singh (PW-15) recorded the statement (Ext.PW-1/A) of Satish Kumar (PW-1), which was sent to the Police Station, where F.I.R. (Ext.PW-13/B) was registered. The injured and deceased were taken to the hospital. An application (Ext.PW-10/E) was filed for conducting the medical examination of the injured. Dr Sanjeev Gupta (PW-10) conducted the medical examination of the injured and found that he had suffered simple injuries. He issued MLC (Ext.PW10/C). The inquest on the dead body was conducted, and a report (Ext.PW-10/B) was issued. An application was filed for conducting the post-mortem examination of the deceased. Dr Sanjeev Gupta (PW-10) conducted the post-mortem of the deceased and found that the death was caused by comma and haemorrhagic shock due to excessive bleeding. He issued the report(Ext.PW-10/A). HC Amrit Singh (PW-15) went to the spot and prepared the site plan (Ext.PW-15/A). He found 12-foot marks of dragging the motorcycle by the truck. The truck was parked at Bohli Nala. The driver was missing. The Registration Certificate (Ext. PW-2/C), insurance certificate (Ext. PW-2/D) and logbook (Ext. PW-2/E) of the truck were taken into possession vide memo (Ext.PW-2/B. The Registration Certificate Ext.PW-9/B), and insurance certificate (Ext.PW-9/C) were taken into possession vide memo (Ext.PW-9/A) of the motorcycle. Ph
Malkeet Singh Gill v. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Gujarat v. Dilipsinh Kishorsinh Rao
State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Nahar Singh
Arvind Singh v. State of Maharashtra
Revisional court acquits of rash driving/death charges where site plan shows victim vehicle on wrong side, speed unquantified, negligence opinions inadmissible; upholds conviction for fleeing without....
Revisional jurisdiction under CrPC Section 397 limited to patent errors/perversity, not re-appreciating evidence; driving on wrong side of road negligence causing accident, upheld conviction but redu....
Rashness or negligence in driving not proved by accident alone, vague high speed claims, or absence of licence; injury inconsistency doubts prosecution; revisional jurisdiction limited to patent erro....
Revisional jurisdiction limited to patent errors or perversity; no re-appreciation of evidence; overtaking on wrong side while ignoring oncoming traffic constitutes rash negligence justifying convict....
Negligence while driving under intoxication resulting in damage to property is a valid ground for conviction under criminal law, demonstrating the importance of maintaining road safety standards.
The court held that concurrent findings of two lower courts regarding negligence and causation in a motor vehicle accident are binding unless proven erroneous, reinforcing limitations on the scope of....
Revisional jurisdiction under CrPC limits High Court to correcting patent defects or perversity; cannot reappreciate evidence to upset concurrent conviction absent jurisdictional error or miscarriage....
Skid marks and eyewitness high speed testimony prove rash negligent driving under IPC 279/337; revisional court cannot reappreciate evidence or disturb concurrent findings absent perversity.
Revisional jurisdiction limited; cannot reappreciate evidence without perversity. Overtaking motorcycle on curve amid oncoming traffic is rash negligence under IPC Sections 279/337; probation inappli....
Revisional jurisdiction limited to patent errors or perversity, not reappreciating concurrent findings; high speed in crowded area causing loss of control despite sudden obstacle constitutes driver n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.