IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
M/s Tiloksons Brewery and Distillery – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 16382 of 2025
Decided On : 02-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s licenses cancellation process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on inspection legality. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural fairness. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
1. Petitioner had been licensed to manufacture Indian Made Foreign Spirit & Country Liquor in the Distillery at Mainthappal, Kala Amb, District Sirmour, H.P. Petitioner held various licenses under Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 in Forms D-2, L-11, L-1A, L-1C, L-13C, L-15 & L-16 for the year 2025-26. Its grievance is against the order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-11) passed by Collector (Excise)-cum-Additional Commissioner State Taxes & Excise, South Zone, Shimla - respondent No. 3, recommending to Commissioner State Taxes & Excise-cum-Financial Commissioner (Excise) Himachal Pradesh - respondent No. 2 cancellation of petitioner’s licenses in Forms D-2 & L-11 and also against the order dated 04.07.2025 passed by the Commissioner State Taxes & Excise-cum-Financial Commissioner (Excise), H.P.-respondent No. 2 cancelling the petitioner’s licenses in Forms D-2 and L-11 (Annexure P-15).
2. Facts necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition are as under:
(i) Based upon an information, respondent No. 2 - Commissioner State Taxes & Excise on 30.04.2025 constituted the following team under the leadership of Additional Commissioner (IT, EIU & Enforcement) for conducting a surprise inspection of petitioner’s unit:-
“1) Sh. Himanshu Panwar, Dy. Commissioner Excise Sirmour.
2) Sh. Aman Sophat, ACSTE o/o JCSTE Central Zone Una.
3) Sh. Sachin, ACSTE Nalagarh-II.
4) Sh. Anurag Garg, ACSTE Bilaspur.
5) Sh. Kuldeep Singh, ACSTE Nalagarh-III.
6) Sh. Rupinder Singh, STEO, BBN Baddi.
7) Sh. Manoj Kumar, STEO o/o JCSTE Central Zone Una
8) Sh. Manoj Sacdeva, ASTEO, SZ, Parwanoo.”
Petitioner’s premises were inspected by the team on 04.05.2025. Inspection report (Annexure P-2) was submitted by respondent No. 4 - the Deputy Commissioner State Taxes & Excise, District Sirmour regarding surprise inspection of petitioner’s premises on 04.05.2025 at about 2.00 a.m. conducted as per orders of respondent No. 2 under the leadership of Sh. U.S. Rana, Additional Commissioner State Taxes & Excise (Enforcement) HQ Shimla by a team consisting of following officers:-
“1. Sh. Himanshu R. Panwar, DC, STE, Sirmour, HP. 2. Sh. Sachin, AC, STE, Nalagarh-II.
3. Sh. Anurag Garg, AC, STE, Bilaspur.
4. Sh. Aman Sophat, AC, STE, CZ, Una.
5. Sh. Kuldeep Singh, AC, STE, Nalagarh-III.
6. Sh. Manoj Kumar, STEO, CZ, Una.
7. Sh. Rupender Singh, STEO, BBN.
8. Sh. Manoj Sacdeva, ASTEO, SZ, Parwanoo.”
The report inter alia mentions that the team reached the licensed premises at about 2:00 a.m. on 04.05.2025 and found unauthorized manufacturing of liquor with labels of different brands namey ‘Royal Blue’ meant for sale in Uttrakhand; Labour force of around 20 people working on bottling chain; Labels of country liquor brand namely ‘Santra’ for sale in Uttrakhand, Artisian Dry Zin blended and bottled by Plot No. 124 Rudrapur, Uttrakhand were found; PP caps embossed with ‘Shivalik Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Chandigarh Excise’ were also found; A truck was fund stationed in the premises loaded with PET bottles. During inspection, the team telephonically contacted State Taxes & Excise Officer (STEO) Incharge and was directed to reach the premises. The STEO reached the premises at about 4:20 a.m. and was associated during inspection. The inspecting team found the licensee to have contravened the provisions of Sections 39 (1)(a), 39(2)(i) and 39(2)(iii) of the H.P. Excise Act, 2011 as also Punjab Distillery Rules 1932 by indulging in:-
‘1. Carrying out bottling operations after designated hours in un-authorized manner;
2 Bottling of illegal brands without approval of the designated authorities;
3. Illegal transportation, storage and possession of ENA for manufacturing of liquor un-authorizedly;
4. Illegal storage of labels, PP caps and pet bottles;
5. Operating the manufacturing facility without prio
Procedural lapses in the constitution of inspection teams under the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act invalidate administrative actions, emphasizing the necessity for adherence to established legal framewo....
Point of Law : For want of the inspection report before this Court, it cannot be presumed that the substance of the inspection report or the summary of the documents was furnished and that the summar....
Indefinite suspension of excise licenses for compoundable offenses is disproportionate if based on contradictory records and unadmitted core allegations; must direct compounding and renewal considera....
The cancellation order must contain reasons for cancellation and cannot be supplemented by subsequent explanations. Mere institution of a criminal case against a person does not automatically disqual....
The Excise Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to compound offences under Section 75 of the Odisha Excise Act, 2008, as authority is reserved for the Collector or specific Excise Officers.
The grant or refusal of Excise Licenses must be in accordance with the specific and non-exhaustive conditions provided in the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sit....
The State had no legislative competence to levy Excise Duty on rectified spirit not fit for human consumption, and the imposition of Excise Duty on presumptive production of liquor was ultra vires to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.