Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Chain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P – Respondent
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J.
The petitioner has filed the instant petition, praying therein for the following substantive reliefs:-
“i) That the impugned action of the respondent education department rejecting the claim of the petitioner for stepping up his pay at par with his junior proforma respondent No.5 vide impugned orders dated 2.1.2009 Annexure P-6 be declared unreasonable, harsh, discriminatory and arbitrary, against the provisions of service jurisprudence and ultra vires to the Constitution.
ii) That the impugned orders dated 2.1.2009 Annexure P-6 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of step up of pay may kindly be quashed and set aside being unjust, illegal, arbitrary, against all canons of law and Principle of Natural Justice, in colorable exercise of powers and in violation of the Constitution of India and the petitioner may kindly be held entitled for pay @ Rs. 7220/- instead of Rs. 6600/- at par with the proforma respondent No.5 w.e.f. February, 1998.
iii) That the respondents be directed to grant the pay to the petitioner @Rs.7220/- w.e.f. 10.02.1998 at par with proforma respondent No.5 with all consequential benefits with interest @9% per annum.”
2. The pr
A government employee senior in service must not receive lesser pay than a junior in the same cadre, and the absence of justifiable reasons for pay disparity constitutes a violation of constitutional....
The principle that a senior employee cannot receive less pay than a junior is upheld, prompting the court to direct equal pay adjustments based on established seniority and promotion timelines.
While Implementing scheme, difference in pay scales on account of grant of financial upgradation under old ACP Scheme (15.12.1998) under this scheme within same cadre shall not be construed as an ano....
The principle of stepping up pay must be applied when seniors in the same cadre are receiving lower salaries than their juniors, ensuring equitable pay that adheres to constitutional mandates.
Seniors are entitled to pay parity with juniors unless the junior's higher pay is due to advance increments or similar exceptions, which were not established in this case.
Rule 21 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002, does not apply when the pay anomaly is not a direct result of its application, particularly when the higher pay of juniors is due to prior ad ....
Equal pay for equal work must consider seniority, qualifications, and nature of work, establishing that discrimination against meritorious employees is unconstitutional.
Entitlement of a senior employee to stepping up of pay equal to that of a junior employee, conditions for stepping up of pay, and the applicability of various judgments related to equal pay for equal....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
