IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SUSHIL KUKREJA
Vishavdeep alias Vishwadeep alias Aala – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sushil Kukreja, J.
The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “ BNSS ”) for grant of bail in case FIR No. 71 of 2023, dated 05.05.2023, under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short “NDPS Act”), registered at Police Station Manali, District Kullu, H.P.
2. The facts giving rise to the instant petition can be summarized as under:
2(a). On 04.05.2023, the police party was on patrolling duty and around 10:00 p.m., when they were present near Jeep Union, Bhootnath Mandir Manali, they received a secret information that near Hotel Hillans, Vishavdeep @ Aalla (petitioner herein), who was residing in the building of one Prem Singh Thakur, as a tenant, was doing illegal trade of chitta/heroin and if his room was searched, huge quantity of chitta/heroin could be recovered. Acting upon the aforesaid information, the police party reached near Hotel Hillans and associated Prem Singh Thakur and Parvesh as independent witnesses in the proceedings. In presence of the aforesaid witnesses, the police party entered the room of Vishavdeep @ Aalla and on seeing the p
State of Maharashtra Vs. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao
State of Tamilnadu vs. S.A.Raja
Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav Vs. State of Maharashtra and another
The severity of allegations in a narcotics case prohibits bail unless substantial changes in circumstances are demonstrated, regardless of the length of pre-trial custody.
Successive bail applications require substantial change in circumstances; without such change, they cannot be entertained.
Successive bail applications require substantial change in circumstances; mere delay in trial does not suffice for bail in serious offenses.
Grant of bail under the NDPS Act requires meeting specific twin conditions, which were not satisfied, and mere delay in trial does not justify bail unless supported by substantial change in circumsta....
Successive bail applications require substantial change in circumstances; filing charge sheet does not qualify as such, nor does unproven trial delay. Courts must exercise restraint to uphold judicia....
The significance of the commercial quantity of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and the impact of the ongoing pandemic on trial proceedings were central legal points established in the judg....
The court reinforced that bail serves to protect an individual's personal liberty, particularly when prolonged detention without trial raises constitutional concerns under Article 21, emphasizing the....
Prolonged pre-trial detention without expeditious trial violates Article 21, entitling accused to bail despite prior rejection, if material trial delays or changed circumstances exist.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.