SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ROMESH VERMA
Sansar Chand – Appellant
Versus
Leela Dhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Jamwal
For the Respondent: Tara Singh Chauhan, Surya Chauhan

JUDGMENT :

ROMESH VERMA, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree as passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar dated 29.04.2021, whereby the appeal preferred by the present appellant/plaintiff was dismissed and the judgment and decree as passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No.1 Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P dated 20.03.2020 was affirmed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for specific performance of oral agreement to sell in the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No.1, Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. on 19.03.2015. It was averred in the plaint that the defendants are recorded owners-in-possession of the land comprised in Khata Khatauni No.39 min/44, Khasra Nos. 96, 97, 103 and 104, measuring 03-02-01 bighas, situated in muhal Shakohar/181, Tehsil Sundernagar, Distt. Mandi, H.P. The defendants have sold the suit land to the plaintiff through an oral agreement to sell in the presence of the witnesses and in terms of the said agreement, the defendants received the entire sale consideration of Rs.1,40,000/- on 15.03.2000 from the plaintiff in the presence of the witnesses. Further, the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top