IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
Arvinder Singh @ Billa - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. MP (M) No. 128 of 2026
Decided On : 02-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. heroin recovered from vehicle occupied by petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties contend on possession parity and risks. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. bail discretion considers offence nature antecedents. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. vehicle occupants have conscious contraband possession. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. intermediate ndps quantity bars easy bail. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. antecedents roles defeat parity claim. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. bail petition dismissed limited observations. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 120 of 2025, dated 19.08.2025, registered in Police Station Dhalli, Shimla, District Shimla, H. P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS).
2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the police were on patrolling duty on 19.08.2025 in the vicinity of the Dhalli area. They received a secret information at about 3.25 a.m. that Sunil Kumar, Arvinder Singh and Gurpreet Singh were present in a vehicle bearing registration No. PB-01D-2378, which was parked near the rear gate of Sacred Heart School. They were in possession of a contraband substance which could be recovered by their search. The police joined the independent witness and reached the spot, where the car was found parked. The person sitting in the driver’s seat identified himself as Gurpreet Singh. The person sitting on the front seat identified himself as Arvinder Singh, and the person sitting on the rear seat identified himself as Sunil Kumar. The police searched the vehicle and recovered 29.840 grams of heroin kept beneath the foot mat of the rear seat. The police seized the heroin and arrested the occupants of the vehicle. The quantity of heroin stated to have been recovered by the police is intermediate, and the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply to the present case. The police have filed the charge sheet. No fruitful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody. The recovery was effected from beneath the foot mat of the rear seat, and the petitioner was not in possession of the heroin. Gurpreet Singh has been enlarged on bail by the Court vide order dated 24.11.2025, passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 2676 of 2025, and the petitioner is entitled to bail on the principle of parity. The petitioner was convicted in FIR No. 35 of 2018. FIR No. 20 of 2025 and 29 of 2023 are pending against the petitioner. The petitioner belongs to a respectable family, and there is no chance of his absconding. He would abide by all the terms and conditions that the Court may impose upon him. Hence, it is prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.
3. The petition is opposed by filing a status report, asserting that the police were on patrolling duty on 19.08.2025. They received a secret information at about 3:25 am that a vehicle bearing registration No. PB-01D-2378 was transporting heroin, and a huge quantity of heroin could be recovered during its search. The information was credible. It was reduced to writing and was sent to the Supervisory Officer. The police joined Gopal Sharma and went towards the place where the vehicle was parked. The police found three people present in the vehicle. The driver identified himself as Gurpreet Singh, the person sitting on the front seat identified himself as Arvinder Singh, and the person sitting on the rear seat identified himself as Sunil Kumar. The police gave their search to the occupants of the vehicle and searched the vehicle. The police recovered a transparent polythene kept beneath the foot mat of the rear seat. The police checked the polythene packet and recovered 29.840 grams of heroin. The police seized the vehicle and the heroin and arrested the occupants. The heroin was sent to SFSL, Junga, and as per the result, it indicated the presence of Diacetylmorphine (heroi
Vehicle occupants in conscious possession of intermediate heroin quantity recovered therein; bail denied despite no Section 37 rigours, considering drug menace, criminal antecedents, trafficking indi....
Bail denied in NDPS case with intermediate contraband quantity due to accused's criminal antecedents, prior similar offences, repetition risk, and societal drug menace, rejecting parity with co-accus....
Bail denied in NDPS case with intermediate heroin quantity due to prima facie conscious possession in own house, rejection of parity over differing co-accused roles, and criminal antecedents indicati....
Front passenger in vehicle with intermediate heroin quantity has prima facie conscious possession; bail granted to first-time offender likely for personal use, no Section 37 rigours, societal roots, ....
Bail denied in NDPS case with intermediate quantity due to criminal antecedents under NDPS, risk of repetition, and societal drug menace, emphasizing balanced consideration of liberty against public ....
Prolonged pre-trial detention may warrant bail despite serious accusations; rights to speedy trial and personal liberty are paramount.
Bail denied in NDPS intermediate quantity case due to criminal antecedents, prior bail violation via similar offence, and prima facie conscious possession from presence at recovery site.
The presence of criminal antecedents significantly influences bail decisions, emphasizing the need to protect society from habitual offenders.
Bail denied in NDPS intermediate quantity case due to prima facie involvement, prior similar offence in antecedents, and societal need to combat drug menace despite Section 37 rigours inapplicable.
The Court ruled that bail cannot be granted in drug-related offenses without careful consideration of the accused's antecedents, emphasizing public safety.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.