Rohit Sharma vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(HP) 213

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA
Rohit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Aman Parth Sharma, Rishab Negi
For the Respondents: Anish Banshtu, Shanti Swaroop Bhatti

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP SHARMA, J.

1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, prayer has been made by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.121/2018, dated 02.07.2018, lodged at Police Station Joginder Nagar, under Sections 306 and 34 of IPC, as well as consequential proceedings pending in the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Sarkaghat, Camp at Joginder Nagar, i.e. Session Trial No. 45/2019, titled as State Vs. Munish Kumar and Others .

2. Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioner, is that no case much less case under Sections 306 of 34 of IPC is made out against the petitioner and as such, no fruitful purpose would be served by permitting the criminal proceedings to continue against him, pursuant to FIR, sought to be quashed in the instant proceedings. While making this Court peruse contents of the FIR as well as final report submitted under Section 173 of Cr.P.C., Mr. Parth, learned counsel representing the petitioner, stated that neither there is any suicide note left behind by deceased Manoj Sharma