Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
State of H.P. – Appellant
Versus
Meera Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of alleged assault incident. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial proceedings and prosecution evidence overview. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial acquittal for unreliable evidence; state appeals. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. parties argue on evidence appreciation and interference. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. interfere with acquittal only if perverse or unreasonable. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. informant's testimony exaggerated, medically uncorroborated. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. family witnesses contradict on material incident details. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. no independent witnesses; accused injury unexplained. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. uphold reasonable trial view; dismiss appeal. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18.10.2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.2, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. (learned Trial Court) vide which the respondents (accused before learned Trial Court) were acquitted of the commission of offences punishable under Sections 451, 323 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they w
Appellate interference in acquittal only if perverse or no reasonable acquittal view possible; upheld trial court's reasonable findings on witness contradictions, medical non-corroboration, and lack ....
In appeals against acquittal, interference warranted only if perverse or no reasonable acquittal view possible; strained relations, contradictions, undisclosed prior injury justify upholding acquitta....
Appellate courts interfere with acquittal only if perverse or no reasonable view possible; non-explanation of accused injuries, witness contradictions, inconsistent prosecution version justify uphold....
The appellate court may overturn a trial acquittal only if clear evidence of wrongdoing exists; otherwise, the acquittal stands due to the presumption of innocence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
