SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Sh. Suresh Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others - Respondents
CWP No. 7902 of 2025
Decided On : 20-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General.

Higher pay scale entitlement for promoted clerks arises after two years regular service from promotion date, not linked to typing test passage unless explicitly stated in promotion order.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Category/Post wise Revised Pay) Rules 2012 - Promotion of Class-IV employees to Clerk posts - Requirement to qualify typing test on computer within probation period for confirmation - Such condition does not postpone entitlement to higher pay scale to two years after passing typing test - Benefit accrues after completion of two years regular service from date of promotion where promotion order contains no explicit linkage - Subsequent government communication providing clarification on grade pay not of general application but in personam - Withdrawal of erroneously perceived benefit and ordered recovery unjustified. (Paras 8 to 15)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner promoted on regular basis to Clerk post with stipulation to pass typing test within probation, failing which reversion. Passed test in first attempt. Granted higher pay scale after two years regular service from promotion date, subsequently withdrawn and recovery ordered on ground that eligibility commences two years post typing test per government letter.

Findings of Court:
Impugned order quashed and set aside; entitled to higher pay scale and grade pay upon completion of two years regular service post promotion; withdrawal set aside; recovery quashed and refunded if effected; all consequential benefits directed.

Issues: Whether entitlement to higher pay scale after two years regular service commences from date of promotion or two years after passing typing test stipulated in promotion order.

Ratio Decidendi: Promotion order requires typing test for avoiding reversion during extended probation but nowhere stipulates higher pay scale per 2012 Rules conditional on test date; government letter clarifies in specific context, not as general rule; test date fixed by department, delay not attributable to promotee who cleared in first chance.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's promotion as clerk and erroneous pay withdrawal (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. no condition links pay scale to typing test date (Para 5)
3. higher pay scale two years after typing test per govt letter (Para 6)
4. issue: pay scale from promotion or test date (Para 7 , 8)
5. promotion order does not condition pay on test passage (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
6. govt letter clarification not generally binding (Para 13)
7. test delay not employee's fault (Para 14)
8. pay scale from two years post-promotion; quash recovery (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for the following relief:-

“A. That a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction may kindly be issued for quashing and setting aside letter dated 17.02.2025 contained in Annexure P-7.

B. That a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction may kindly be issued for directing the Respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner firstly, in Pay Level 7 for the post of Junior Assistant and secondly, in Pay Level 11 for the post of Senior Assistant in terms of orders dated 07.02.2022 12.01.2024, from the due date, along with all consequential benefits.

C. That a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction may kindly be issued for directing the Respondents to grant higher pay scale to the Petitioner in terms of notification dated 27.09.2012 from the due date, i.e. 18.05.2018.

D. That the Respondents may further be directed to pay the arrears accrued on account of such fixation and grant of higher pay scale, forthwith, along with interest @ 12% per annum.”

2. The grievance of the petitioner is in a very narrow compass. Vide Annexure P-2, dated 18.05.2016, the petitioner was promoted, on the recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee, against the post of a Clerk on regular basis with immediate effect in the pay scale of Rs.5910-20200+1900 Grade Pay. In terms of the conditions imposed in this promotion order, the officials so promoted as Clerks were to qualify the typing test on computer with a minimum speed of 25 words per minute in English Typewriting or 20 words per minute in Hindi Typewriting within the probation period, failing which, the candidate was to be reverted from clerk to class-IV posts. It was further stipulated in the promotion order that the incumbent was to pass the typing test within the time prescribed, within the probation period and if the candidate failed to pass the said test, then, another chance would be given and the probation will also be extended.

3. The petitioner passed the typing test in the first attempt on 25.10.2017. Thereafter, the petitioner was granted the pay band of Rs.10300-34800+3200 Grade Pay upon completion of two years of regular service as such, however, vide Annexure P-7, this benefit was withdrawn and recovery was ordered on the ground that the petitioner was erroneously conferred the benefit after completion of two years as from the date of promotion whereas the eligibility of the petitioner for the higher pay scale was to commence from two years post passing of the test stipulated in the promotion order.

4. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of present writ petition.

5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the reasons which have led to the issuance of Annexure P-7 are arbitrary and unjust because the benefits rightly conferred upon the petitioner, stood withdrawn by completely misreading the promotion order of the petitioner as also the notification dated 27.11.2012 (Annexure P-4), i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Category/Post wise Revised Pay) Rules 2012. Learned Counsel submitted that there was no condition in the promotion order that the benefit of the higher pay scale in terms of 2012 Rules shall be after completion of two years as from the date of passing of the typing test. Learned Counsel submitted that holding of the typing test

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top