HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
K. Govindan - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 26243 of 2011 & M.P. No. 1 of 2011
Decided On : 04-01-2024
Cadre Restructuring - Pay Scale Rationalization - G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994, G.O.Ms.No.338 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26.08.2010 - The court considered the re-designation and rationalization of pay scales and upheld the employer's right to restructure the cadre. However, it directed the stepping up of the petitioner's pay to rectify the pay anomaly caused by promotion, citing relevant legal provisions under FR-19 of the Fundamental Rules of the Government of Tamil Nadu.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought re-designation and pay scale revision from Grade - II to Grade - I post and monetary benefits based on G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994 and subsequent revisions. The petitioner's claim was rejected, leading to the filing of the Writ Petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the employer's right to restructure the cadre and rationalize pay scales. It acknowledged the petitioner's qualifications and experience, and directed the stepping up of the petitioner's pay to rectify the pay anomaly caused by promotion.
Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's claim for re-designation and pay scale revision, based on the relevant government orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the employer has the right to restructure the cadre and rationalize pay scales, if such actions result in pay anomalies for qualified employees, the pay should be rectified by stepping up the pay of the affected employee.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was partly allowed, setting aside the impugned order and directing the stepping up of the petitioner's pay to rectify the pay anomaly caused by promotion, without entitlement to arrears.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to first respondent proceeding in Letter No.001462 / CMPC / 199-3, dated 07.03.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent to upgrade petitioner from respective Grade – II to Grade – I post and revise the scale of pay and grant monitory benefits on par with other categories on the line of G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994 with further revisions made in G.O.Ms.No.456 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 31.08.1998.)
1. This Writ Petition is filed for issue of a Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 07.03.2011 and to quash the same and consequently, to re-designate the petitioner from respective Grade - II to Grade - I post and revise the scale of pay and grant monetary benefits on par with the other categories in the light of G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994 with further revisions made in G.O.Ms.No.456 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 31.08.1998.
2. The brief facts of the case are that there are various trade and technical posts in the Police Transport Workshop and recruitment to the said posts are governed by the Ad-hoc Rules framed vide G.O.Ms.No.1111, Home (Police-XIII) Department, dated 04.05.1985. The petitioner possesses the educational qualification of PUC and also had I.T.I certificate in the trade of ‘Mechanic Motor Vehicles’. On 05.10.1987, the petitioner was further promoted as Electrician Grade - II and again was promoted as Electrician Grade - I on 13.07.2005. The scales of pay in respect of the various technical posts had undergone revision during the implementation of IV pay commission recommendations and subsequently as follows:-
| Name | Scale of pay with effect from 01.10.84 as per G.O.555 Fin (PC) dt.10.06.85 | Scale of pay with effect from 01.06.88 as per G.O.666 Fin (PC) dt.27.06.1989 | Revision of pay scale with effect from 01.06.88 as per G.O.562 Fin (PC) dt.01.08.92 | Revision of pay scale with effect from 01.06.88 as per G.O.731 Fin (PC) dt.20.08.94 | Scale of pay with effect from 01.01.96 as per G.O.162 Fin (PC) dt.13.04.98 |
| Electrician II | 555-970 | 825-1200 | 950-1500 | -- | 3050-4590 |
| Fitter | 555-970 | 825-1200 | 950-1500 | 1100-1660 | 4000-6000 |
| Tinker | 555-970 | 825-1200 | ---- | 1100-1660 | 4000-6000 |
| Painter | 555-970 | 825-1200 | 950-1500 | 1100-1660 | 4000-6000 |
| Electrician Grade - I | 555-970 | 825-1200 | 950-1500 | -- | 4000-6000 |
3. Firstly, vide G.O.Ms.No.562 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.08.1992, the scale of pay of Fitter Grade - II was revised as Rs.950-1500 along with the post of Electrician Grade - II based on the recommendation of the Official Committee constituted by the Government. Thereafter, upon receipt of several representations, the Government further constituted One Man Commission to consider the grievances and certain practical inconveniences in extending the revised scales of pay in certain categories in Police Transport Workshop and after the report, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994. By the said Government Order, Rule 9 of the Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1989 was amended, under which, the post of Helper was re- designated as Fitter Grade - II. The post of Fitter Grade - II was further upgraded as Fitter Grade - I and the scale of pay was upgraded as Rs.1100- 1600 with effect from 01.06.1988. Further, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.338 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26.08.2010 after constituting One Man Commission to examine the anomalies, by which, all these posts are classified into Unskilled, Skilled Assistant Grade -II, Skilled Assistant Grade - I, Special
Employer's right to restructure cadre and rationalize pay scales, and the obligation to rectify pay anomalies caused by promotions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the error in fixation of pay is to be corrected right from the III Pay Commission fixation and the petitioners are to be promoted to the highe....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the application and interpretation of Government Order No.25 P & AR Department dated 23.03.2015 to rectify pay anomalies between seniors and ju....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that entitlement to selection grade and special grade is subject to completion of requisite years of service, and recovery orders issued within one....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to the revised pay scale as per the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, regardless of possessing alternative es....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.