SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 169

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
K. Govindan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Muthappan, Advocate. For the Respondents:M. Muthuswamy, Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to first respondent proceeding in Letter No.001462 / CMPC / 199-3, dated 07.03.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent to upgrade petitioner from respective Grade – II to Grade – I post and revise the scale of pay and grant monitory benefits on par with other categories on the line of G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994 with further revisions made in G.O.Ms.No.456 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 31.08.1998.)

1. This Writ Petition is filed for issue of a Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 07.03.2011 and to quash the same and consequently, to re-designate the petitioner from respective Grade - II to Grade - I post and revise the scale of pay and grant monetary benefits on par with the other categories in the light of G.O.Ms.No.731 Finance (Pay cell) Department, dated 29.08.1994 with further revisions made in G.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top