IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SUSHIL KUKREJA
United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Nirmala Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fatal accident facts and claim details (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' denials on negligence and liability (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. tribunal issues, award, licence evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 12) |
| 4. insurer liable despite fake licence sans owner knowledge (Para 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. deceased income rs10k plus 40% prospects (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. bachelor 50% personal expenses deduction (Para 22) |
| 7. multiplier based on deceased age (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. compensation recalculated for mother only (Para 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
SUSHIL KUKREJA, J.
1. The instant appeal is maintained by the appellant/ United India Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “the appellant”), under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short “the Act”) against the award dated 15.03.2016, passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-II, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, HP, in MACP No.97-N/II/2013/2010, with a prayer to set aside/modify the impugned award.
2. Succinctly, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the petitioners (respondents No.1 and 2 herein) filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Act, whereby they sought compensation to the tun

Nirmala Kothari Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited
Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Rajaram and others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi & others
Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another
Amrit Bhanu Shali and others vs. National Insurance Company Limited and others
M. Mansoor and another vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and another
Insurer liable despite fake driving licence unless owner knowingly permitted unlicensed driver; compensation: 40% future prospects for self-employed youth, 50% bachelor personal expenses deduction, m....
Insurer liable for compensation despite fake driving licence unless it proves owner was aware of fakeness and still permitted driver to drive; owner need not verify licence authenticity from issuing ....
The court established that insurers can be held liable to pay compensation even if the driver lacks a valid license, following the 'pay and recover' principle.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in motor accident claims, considering factors such as negligence, income of the deceased, number of dependents, a....
The court upheld that failure to prove the invalidity of a driver's license imposes compensation liability on the insurer, reiterating principles for calculating dependency and future prospects in wr....
Compensation for motor vehicle accident must accurately factor in deceased's income, dependency needs, and established legal standards for future earnings and expense deductions.
The assessment of compensation must ensure fairness and reasonableness while considering income, future prospects, and applying the appropriate multiplier based on the deceased's age.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.