Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SUSHIL KUKREJA
Sudha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Brij Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUSHIL KUKREJA, J.
1. The instant appeal has been maintained by appellants, who were petitioners/claimants before the learned Tribunal below (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioners/claimants”) under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘The Act’) against impugned award, dated 30.10.2012, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Shimla, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Tribunal”), whereby the claim petition filed by the petitioners-claimants, under Section 166 of the Act, was allowed and they were held entitled for compensation of Rs.6,06,000/- alongwith interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the realization of the amount from respondent No. 1-Brij Lal (owner of the offending vehicle).
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners-claimants, Smt. Sudha Devi, wife and Shri Deepak and Shri Sanju sons of Shri Gagan (deceased), filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Act before the learned Tribunal below, wherein they sought compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- from respondent No. 1- Brij Lal and respondent No. 2-ICICI Lombard, Motor Insurance, on account of death of Shri Gagan, whic
Compensation for motor vehicle accident must accurately factor in deceased's income, dependency needs, and established legal standards for future earnings and expense deductions.
The assessment of compensation must ensure fairness and reasonableness while considering income, future prospects, and applying the appropriate multiplier based on the deceased's age.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Rule 220-A(3) of the Rules of 1998 for determining future prospects and the use of the multiplier as per the Second Schedule to ....
The quantum of compensation payable to the claimants in a motor accident claim petition is to be determined by considering various factors, including future prospects, personal expenses of the deceas....
The court established that negligence in motor vehicle accidents must be proven by evidence, and the failure to consider eyewitness accounts can lead to an unjust dismissal of claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
