IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Pawan Wasant Borle - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others - Respondents
CWP No. 1153 of 2026
Decided On : 25-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition confined to rera order enforcement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 4 which is waived by Ms. Sheetal Vyas, learned CGC, Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Raman Ravi Verma, learned Counsel for respondent No.1, respondents No. 2 & 3 and respondent No.4, respectively.
This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:-
(a) To issue writ to the effect that the provision contained in State Legislation as contained in Section 118 (1) and Section 118 (3) (D) of H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 as amended from time to time shall give way to the provisions as envisaged in Sections 11, 18, 19 and 40 of Parliamentary Legislation Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
(b) To quash the Annexure P-6 and Annexure P-7 and Annexure P-8 to the extent the operation of recovery certificate issued under Section 40(1) Annexure P-4 (Colly.) is precluded and hindered.
(c) To recover the total amount, declared as arrear of land revenue vide Annexure P-5 dated 14.11.2022 alongwith interest @9.3% per annum from the date of each payment by sale of properties as mentioned in Annexure P-2 or in alternate by and other mode.
(d) To issue mandate with direction to respondent No. 2 & 3 to execute and comply the orders passed by the respondent No.4 Annexure P-3 and Annexure P- 4(Colly.) in terms of Section 103 of H.P. Land Revenue Act, 1954.”
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is under instructions to confine this writ petition only for relief (d) and other prayers be treated as having been given up. Prayer is accepted. This writ petition is accordingly being heard only for considering relief (d).
In view of writ petition having been confined only to relief (d), submissions made by learned counsel for the appearing parties, pleadings and nature of order being passed hereinafter, notice of this writ petition is not required to be issued to respondents No. 5 & 6. Matter has accordingly been heard at this stage with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. The case set up by the petitioner:-
(i) Respondents No. 5 & 6 represented themselves as promoters of Community Housing Project by the name of “Aamoksh @ Kasauli” which was being constructed by them on land comprised in Khasra Nos. 142/35/2, 143/35/2, 125/13/2, 126/13/2 (Old Khasra Nos.) which have since been assigned new Khasra Nos. i.e. 129/1, 135, 128, 138/1, 146, 129, 136 at Mohal Joul, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, H.P. Respondents No. 5 & 6 had projected themselves to be the owners of the aforesaid land purchased by them in the year 2009 and further that they had all requisite permissions from the Competent Authorities for developing the project including all approvals for setting up housing colony from the Department of Town & Country Planning, H.P. The petitioner acted upon the representation of respondents No. 5 & 6 and booked one housing unit for sale consideration of Rs.88,00,000/-. An agreement to sale was executed by respondents No. 5 & 6 with the petitioner on 26.05.2015. The petitioner paid Rs.78,00,491/- as part consideration to respondents No. 5 & 6, they however, did not abide by terms and conditions of the agreement to sell dated 26.05.2015. Possession of the housing unit in question was however not delivered to the petitioner.
ii) Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner invoked Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The complaint filed by the petitioner was contested by respondents No. 5 & 6. The Himachal Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) allowed the complaint on 26.02.2021 as under:-
i. The Complaints are allowed and the Respondent Promoters are directed to return/refund the amount to the Complainants as under:-
a. Ms. Ashima Sharma- Rs. Twelve lakhs, seventy six thousand, six hundred and forty five (Rs.12,76, 645/-)
b. Shri Pawan Wasant Borle- Rs. Seventy eigh
Recovery of Regulatory Authority compensation as land revenue arrears cannot be stalled by vesting of project land in State; alternative statutory modes like arrest, movable sale, other property proc....
Debt Recovery - Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Insolvency resolution process is not a money suit for recovery nor a suit for execution for any decree or award as distinct from Section 35 of the Arbitrat....
The Real Estate Regulatory Authority can recover amounts as arrears of land revenue under Section 40(1) of the Act of 2016, independent of Civil Court decrees, thus reinforcing its authority in execu....
The recovery of rent due to the Nagar Palika from a tenant in respect of immovable property other than land vested or entrusted to the management of the Nagar Palika can be made under Section 292 of ....
The Zila Panchayat cannot recover contractual amounts as arrears of land revenue; such recovery must follow statutory provisions under the U.P. Kshettra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.