Balbir Singh vs Raj Kumar - 2026 Supreme(HP) 417

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(HP) 417

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr Akshay Katoch, Advocate

JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The present revision is directed against the order dated 15.10.2025, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Solan, HP (learned Trial Court), vide which the complaint filed by the petitioner (applicant before the learned Trial Court) under Section 175(3) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) was dismissed. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the applicant filed an application before the learned Trial Court for issuing a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Sadar, Solan, HP, to register the FIR against the accused under Section 175(3) of BNSS. It was asserted that accused No. 1 is working as Managing Director in Baghat Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, whereas accused No.2 is working as a Manager in the Branch of Baghat Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Chowk Bazar, Solan. HP. The applicant approached the Bank for financial assistance in the year 2011. The bank sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 12.00 lacs to the applicant, which was to be