Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Him Singh @ Hem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ndps convict's parole application rejected despite service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties contend on parole denial validity. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. parole aids reformation, family ties maintenance. (Para 7) |
| 4. offence nature alone cannot deny parole. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. flawed reports require independent authority assessment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. parole granted conditionally for 28 days. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking direction to the respondents to grant 28 days’ parole to him. It has been asserted that the petitioner was convicted by learned Special Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. vide judgment dated 8.11.2025, passed in a Case arising out of FIR No. 139 of 2020, dated 10.9.2020, registered at Police Station Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. for the commission of offence an punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 11 years, pay a fine of Rs. 1,10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for one year and one month. The petitioner has already undergone a total sentence of four years and ten
Parole rejection invalid if solely based on offence nature without evidence of threat to state security or public order; releasing authority must independently assess good conduct and reform potentia....
Parole cannot be denied solely based on the nature of the conviction; maintaining family ties and demonstrating good conduct are paramount for rehabilitation and reform.
Parole cannot be rejected solely for heinous offence nature or reoffending apprehension if jail conduct satisfactory and reformation evident; must balance family ties, rehabilitation against public o....
Releasing authority must independently assess parole applications beyond district non-recommendation; good conduct prisoners entitled to temporary release for family ties despite serious offence, abs....
Parole cannot be rejected solely for heinous nature of offence; must consider good conduct, reformation tendency, family ties maintenance, and absence of threat to public order or society.
Parole cannot be denied solely for heinous nature of offence; requires specific proof of threat to state security or public order, emphasizing reformation, family ties, and good prison conduct over c....
Parole cannot be denied solely for heinous offence; must be based on endangering state security or public order. Good conduct, agricultural need, local support warrant grant despite non-recommendatio....
Parole cannot be denied solely based on objections from the victim's family without substantial evidence; it's essential to balance prisoner rights with public safety.
Parole cannot be denied solely based on the nature of the crime if the convict exhibits good conduct and a tendency to reform, ensuring the maintenance of family ties is critical.
Parole cannot be denied solely based on objections from the victim's family; solid evidence is required to substantiate claims of danger or public disorder.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
