SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1322

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Hans Raj - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
CWPOA No.4078 of 2020
Decided On : 12-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.L. Chaudhary and Mr. H.R. Sidhu, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocate General.

Validly appointed PTA teacher, post-set-aside of termination, entitled to re-engagement with service continuity from initial engagement, contractual status after seven years, regularization w.e.f. 01.04.2018, ensuring parity with similars to uphold Articles 14 and 16.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Service jurisprudence - PTA teachers engaged prior to 31.12.2007 - Valid selection on merit - Termination on complaint adjudicated and set aside by competent authority with finding of validity - Subsequent order for re-engagement issued but implementation deferred due to interim stay on transfer of regular incumbent, now vacated - High Powered Committee directed re-engagement of eligible PTA teachers with grant-in-aid - Entitlement to re-engagement with continuity in service from initial date of engagement, contractual status on completion of seven years, regularization w.e.f. 01.04.2018 as extended to similarly placed and junior incumbents - Denial despite finality of orders and resolution of impediments arbitrary, discriminatory, rendering appellate orders nugatory - Treating equals as unequals impermissible. (Paras 6(i) to 6(vii), 8)

(B) Principles of natural justice - Abrupt disengagement without notice or hearing on basis of complaint, negated post-inquiry - Once appointment validated and re-engagement directed, state inaction post-resolution of stays cannot penalize teacher without fault. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner engaged as Lecturer in Chemistry by PTA on 21.09.2007, disengaged on 01.10.2008 on complaint. Competent authority on 09.09.2013 held appointment valid on merit. Director ordered re-engagement on 21.10.2013 with transfer of regular incumbent, stayed till 01.10.2021. Matter remanded by Tribunal on 11.04.2018 for consideration. State cited pendency of superior court matters, now resolved (2020-2021), yet denied benefits despite parity extended to others.

Findings of Court:
Re-engagement as Lecturer on PTA grant-in-aid basis (deemed or actual) with continuity w.e.f. 21.09.2007, past seniority, salary under grant-in-aid, contractual status post seven years, regularization w.e.f. 01.04.2018 with all consequential benefits; arrears for three years prior to petition filed, per Supreme Court precedents on delayed benefits.

Issues: Whether denial of re-engagement and benefits post-validation of appointment and vacation of stays sustainable; entitlement to parity with similars granted continuity, contractual status and regularization; validity of state inaction rendering prior orders inoperative.

Ratio Decidendi: State cannot withhold re-engagement and service benefits on non-existent grounds post-resolution of litigations; validly appointed PTA teacher entitled to notional reinstatement with full benefits including parity to avoid discrimination; appellate validation attains finality, denial thereof arbitrary and unconstitutional.

Result: Petition allowed with directions for re-engagement, continuity, regularization and arrears within stipulated time.

Table of Content
1. valid pta lecturer appointment upheld by sdm. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. reengagement ordered but stalled by stays. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. final valid appointment mandates reengagement benefits. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Petitioner [Hans Raj], a former Lecturer in Chemistry in GSSS Dasehra, has come up before this Court seeking the following reliefs:

(i). That the respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the person working against the applicant to some other place and re-engage the applicant with all consequential benefits.

(ii) That the applicant may kindly be allowed to work as Lecturer Chemistry at Govt. Sr. Sec. School Dasehra Distt. Mandi on PTA grant-in-aid basis with all consequential benefits.”

FACTUAL MATRIX:

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that he was engaged as Lecturer in Chemistry by PTA of GSSS Dasehra, District Mandi on 21.09.2007. Based on a complaint, the services of the petitioner were disengaged on 01.10.2008. Feeling aggrieved against his termination, the petitioner filed CWP No1066 of 2009, on which, this Court passed an order on 02.08.2012, directing the petitioner to make a representation before Chairman-cum-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mandi. In compliance to Court Orders dated 02.08.2012, the petitioner submitted a representation, on which, the Chairman-cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mandi, passed an order on 09.09.2013, by recording finding that the selection/appointment of the petitioner [Hans Raj] as Lecturer in Chemistry, by PTA Committee of GSSS Dasehra on 21.09.2007 was held to be valid and was made strictly in terms of merit. Pursuant to orders dated 09.09.2013 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, the Respondent no 2-Director Higher Education issued an order on 21.10.2013 [Annexure A-1], directing to re-engage the petitioner as a Lecturer (Chemistry) in GSSS Dasehra. While passing of this order, the Director Higher Education mandated that one Sh. Rakesh Kumar Azad, a regular employee, who was posted as a Lecturer (Chemistry) in GSSS Dasehra be transferred to GSSS Kotkhai [B] District Shimla, and this place of posting was modified to GSSS Deot, against vacancy.

2(i). After passing of order of re-engagement orders on 21.10.2013 [Annexure A-1], the petitioner made a representation for permitting him to rejoin as Lecturer in Chemistry in GSSS Dasehra but the joining of petitioner was deferred, for the reason, that the regular incumbent posted in GSSS Dasehra namely, Rakesh Kumar Azad, filed a CWP No.8527 of 2013 [Annexure A-2], whereby, his transfer orders were stayed by this Court. It is averred that in terms of communication dated 22.05.2014 [Annexure A-5/T] issued by Principal Secretary [Education] a High Powered Committee was constituted under the Chairmanship of Chief Secretary and aforesaid Committee also decided to re-engage all PTA provided teachers who were engaged before 31.12.2007 and whose services were disengaged to be re-engaged in case, they were eligible under Recruitment and Promotion Rules; and GIA was also directed to be released in their favour. In the above background, the petitioner filed the instant petition before State Administrative Tribunal, seeking re-engagement and release of grant-in-aid on the basis of the orders dated 21.10.2013 [Annexure A-1], with all consequential benefits.

STAND OF STATE AUTHORITIES IN REPLY

3. Petitioner filed an Original Application No. 1400 of 2018 in March 2018, before State Administrative Tribunal. Pursuant to the filing of the Original Application, the State Administrative Tribunal passed an order on 11.04.2018, directing Director Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, to consider transferring the private respondent No.4, Rakesh Kumar Azad, to a suitable station, so as to facilitate the continuance of petitioner as a Lecturer in Chemistry on PTA, basis in GSSS Dasehra, District Mandi on the same terms and conditions, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to petitioner as well as to the private responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top