Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Monika Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's qualifications, appointment, and grant-in-aid claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grant-in-aid denied for irregular appointment without approval. (Para 3) |
| 3. parity required for similarly situated teachers in aided schools. (Para 4) |
| 4. court directs time-bound examination for grant-in-aid parity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Petitioner, Monika Sharma, has come up before this Court seeking the following relief :-
“(i) that the respondent state may be directed to release to the applicant grant in aid from the date the applicant is serving in the respondent No.3 school and to pay arrears alongwith interest @ 12% per annum within such time as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit.”
FACTUAL MATRIX:
2. Precisely, the case is that after passing of Graduation in 1998 and Bachelors in Education [B.Ed in 2012], the petitioner was appointed as Primary Teacher in respondent No.3-School i.e. S.D. Chand Public Senior Secondary School, Ghuggar, which was being run by respondent No.4-Goswami Snatan Dharam Education Society, Baijnath. It is averred that the petitioner was initially appointed on contract basis and thereafter vide order dated 25.05.2011 her services we
Employees of recognized aided schools entitled to grant-in-aid on parity with similarly situated teachers granted aid despite procedural irregularities or excess sanctioned strength, to uphold equali....
PTA-appointed Assistant Professor from reserved category meeting relaxed 50% Master's marks and eligibility test criteria entitled to Grant-in-Aid salary from appointment date; denial despite parity ....
Eligible PTA college teachers entitled to grant-in-aid salary despite NET/SLET lack post-dispensation; discriminatory denial while granting others violates Articles 14,16; rules persist without repea....
Once the decision has been taken to release the grant-in-aid, it should be released uniformly without putting any riders in the same.
Recognition and financial aid for educational institutions must align with equitable staff employment and ensure compliance with established legal conditions for staff remuneration.
The court held that a teacher in a private aided school, whose services were taken over by the state, is entitled to grant-in-aid for salary with payments limited to three years prior to filing due t....
Service Matter1 - Under Section 106 of the Schedule “F”, it is nowhere provided that if the appointment of Teacher is made in Non Granted School, then Teacher cannot be given an appointment in the gr....
The obligation of the State to provide free education under Article 21A does not create an automatic right for private institutions to receive recurring grants from the government.
The Right to free education does not confer entitlement to recurring aid for all private primary schools; compliance with legal requirements is essential for salary claims against the State.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
