IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Sulesh Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Petitioner, Sulesh Chand, had filed an Original Application No. 6575 of 2016 before the State Administrative Tribunal and upon abolition of the Tribunal, the matter stands transferred to this Court as CWPOA No. 823 of 2020 seeking the following reliefs:-
7(a) That the respondents be directed to continue with the services of the applicant as per the notifications vide Annexure A-4,A-5, and if after the filing of the present O.A the services of the applicant are terminated, he may kindly be ordered to be re-instated;
7(b). That the services of the applicant be regulated strictly in compliance of Annexures A-4 and A-5 and further in consonance with the Grant-in-Aid to PTA rules 2006 framed by the State Government and the Grant-in-Aid may kindly be ordered to be released in favour of the applicant as is being done in the newly appointed teachers vide Annexure A-7”.
FACTUAL MATRIX:
2. Case as set up is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Professor in Political Science under the respondents No. 3 and 4 through PTA under Pandit Sant Ram Government College, Baijnath against vacant post on 26.09.2014 at fixed salary of Rs.8,000/-per month, which was
The court held that a teacher in a private aided school, whose services were taken over by the state, is entitled to grant-in-aid for salary with payments limited to three years prior to filing due t....
Termination of PTA teacher's engagement without show cause notice, defying prior grant-in-aid directions, is arbitrary, violates natural justice and Article 14; mandates quashing and retrospective re....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- from the date of her appointment, the benefit of the Sixth Pay Commission,....
The court reinforced that salaries must be paid to teachers based on regularized appointments, rejecting any arbitrary withholding by the State as per established constitutional rights, regardless of....
Equal pay for equal work is mandated, and entitlements under identical circumstances must be uniformly applied, per Article 14, with financial benefits limited to three years prior to petition filing....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.